贝那普利对慢性心力衰竭患者血清和肽素及N端脑钠肽前体的影响 |
| |
引用本文: | 陈福生,罗莘,蒲晓群. 贝那普利对慢性心力衰竭患者血清和肽素及N端脑钠肽前体的影响[J]. 中国综合临床, 2014, 0(1): 48-51 |
| |
作者姓名: | 陈福生 罗莘 蒲晓群 |
| |
作者单位: | [1]湖南省株洲恺德心血管病医院心内科,412000 [2]中南大学湘雅医院心内科,412000 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的观察贝那普利对慢性心力衰竭患者血清和肽素及N端脑钠肽前体(NT.proBNP)的影响,探讨贝那普利抑制心室重构的作用机制。方法慢性心力衰竭患者238例随机分为对照组118例(强心、利尿、扩血管等常规药物治疗),治疗组120例(常规药物治疗+贝那普利)。两组均连续治疗6个月。治疗前、后行血清和肽素、NT—proBNP浓度检测;并检测慢性心力衰竭患者治疗前、后左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)及左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)的变化;对比两组各指标变化的差异。结果治疗组治疗前、后和肽素[(17.8±7.9)、(4.9±1.3)pmol/L,t=7.331,P=0.008]、NT-proBNP[(1779.6±838.3)、(327.8±226.8)ng/L,t=10.236,P=0.002]、LVEF[(33.5±6.2)%、(50.5±5.2)%,t=3.336,P=0.009]、LVESD[(47.6±8.9)、(32.9±5.7)mm,t=2.767,P=0.010]、LVEDD[(60.2±7.1)、(43.24-5.6)mm,t=2.882,P=0.009]比较差异均有统计学意义。治疗6个月,治疗组各指标与对照组[对照组:和肽素为(10.5±2.4)nmol/L;NT—proBNP为(1076.6±486.6)pg/L,LVEF为(36.6±5.6)%,LVESD为(45.9±6.8)mm,LVEDD为(57.54-5.4)mm]比较差异均有统计学意义(P值分别为0.049、0.010、0.035、0.038、0.048)。结论贝那普利可降低慢性心力衰竭患者血清和肽素、NT—proBNP的浓度,抑制神经内分泌因子,抑制心室重构,改善心功能。
|
关 键 词: | 心力衰竭 和肽素 N端脑钠肽前体 贝那普利 |
Effect of benazepril on plasma copeptin and N terminal brain natriuretic peptide in patients with chronicheart failure |
| |
Affiliation: | Chen Fusheng, Luo Xin, Pu Xiaoqur Cardiaology Department, Kind Cardiovascular Disease Hospital, Zhuzhou 412000, China |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To investigate the effects of benazepril on plasma copeptin and N terminal brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP) in the patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in order to explore the mechanism of benazepril on ventricular remodeling. Methods Two hundred and thirty-eight patients with CHF were randomized into control group (n = 118 ) and therapy group (n = 120). Patients in control group were received regular treatment including medicine of treating cardiotonic diuretic and vasodilator for 6 months, while in therapy group were given benazepril beside regular treatment. The levels of copeptin, NT-proBNP weremeasured before and after treatment. The left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF), left ventricular end systolic diameter(LVESD) and left ventricular end diastole diameter(LVEDD) were recorded and compared before and after treatment. Results In treatment group, the levels of copeptin and NT-pro BNP, LVEF, LVEDD, LVESD were (4. 9 + 1.3 ) pmol/L and (327.8 ± 226. 8) ng/L, (33.5 ± 6. 2) %, (47. 6 ± 8.9) mm, (60. 2 ± 7. 1 )mm before treatment, different from that after treatment ( ( 17.8 ± 7.9 ) pmol/L, t = 7. 331, P = 0. 008 ; ( 1 779. 6 ~838.3) pg/mL, t = 10.236,P =0.002;(50.5±5.2)%,t =3.336,P =0.009;(32.9 +5.7) mm, t = 2. 767, P = 0. 010 ; (43.2 ± 5.6 ) mm, t = 2. 882, P = 0. 009 ). After treatment the levels of copeptin, NT- proBNP,LVEF,LVESD and LVEDD in treatment were lower than that of control group( control group :copeptin: ( 10. 5 ± 2.4 ) nmol/L; NT-proBNP: ( 1076.6 ±486.6 ) pg,/L; LVEF: (36. 6 + 5.6 ) % ; LVESD: (45. 9 + 6. 8 ) mm; LVEDD : ( 57. 5± 5.4 ) mm), and there was significant difference between groups ( P = 0. 049,0. 010, 0. 035,0. 038, 0. 048 respectively). Conclusion Benazepril treatment could decrease the level of plasma copeptin and NT-proBNP in CI-IF patients, inhibit neuroendocrine and the ventricular remodeling, and then improve the heart function. |
| |
Keywords: | Heart failure Copeptin N terminal brain natriuretic peptide Benazepril |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|