Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study Comparing Elective vs Hip Fracture Cases

BackgroundThe changing evaluation of provider metrics and payments in total hip arthroplasty (THA) necessitates current information for leaders in advocacy and policy. This study aims to use a contemporary nationwide cohort to compare and quantify the differences between the preoperative profile and clinical outcomes of THA performed for elective indications and for femoral neck fractures.MethodsPatient records from 2007 to 2017 were queried from an administrative claims database of privately insured patients comparing THA performed for femoral neck fractures vs elective indications. Ninety-day readmission rates as well as in-hospital and 90-day postdischarge rates of local and systemic complications were collected and compared with multivariate logistic regression.ResultsOf 83,319 primary THAs, 6895 (8.3%) were fracture cases and 76,424 (91.7%) were elective. A greater proportion of fracture patients were older, female, not obese, and had a higher burden of comorbidities (all P < .001). Fracture patients had significantly higher average lengths of stay and complication rates for all perioperative and postoperative joint and systemic complications measured (all P < .001) as well as 90-day cost (32,228 vs 22,917 USD, P < .001).ConclusionFracture patients are inherently more difficult cases to manage as surgeons. The results of these data may have significance in improving care coordination and provide evidence for further risk adjustment in payment models. Leaders in advocacy and policy should consider patient-level risk adjustments within alternative payment models to account for the increased association of complications, length of stay, readmission rate, and comorbidities in fracture patients receiving THA compared to elective patients.