首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The Short Form KOOS,JR Is Valid for Revision Knee Arthroplasty
Institution:1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Fishers, IN;2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY;3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY;1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;1. OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC;2. OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC;3. Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Chicago, IL;1. Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey;2. Medical Faculty, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz May?s University, Samsun, Turkey
Abstract:BackgroundThe Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) is a reliable, responsive, and validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of knee health in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The validity of the KOOS, JR for revision TKA remains unknown.MethodsWe identified 314 patients who underwent revision TKA and had completed preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMs. Validation included assessment of local dependence, unidimensionality, internal consistency, external construct validity, responsiveness, and floor effects preoperatively and ceiling effects at 2 years postoperatively.ResultsAmong patients undergoing revision TKA, the KOOS, JR demonstrated an absence of residual item correlation, adequate unidimensionality, high internal consistency (Person Separation Index: 0.897), and high external construct validity with existing validated PROMs, including KOOS Pain (Spearman’s correlation coefficient 0.89) and KOOS activities of daily living (0.90) domains. The KOOS, JR was more responsive (standardized response means: 1.14) to revision TKA than other common knee PROMs. Three percent of revision TKA patients were at the floor (lowest score) preoperatively and 9% reached the ceiling (highest possible score) postoperatively.ConclusionsKOOS, JR performs well in revision TKA patients with regard to internal consistency, external validity, responsiveness, and floor and ceiling effects. Our results support extending its use to revision TKA in both clinical and research settings.
Keywords:patient-reported outcome measures  health-related quality of life  revision total knee arthroplasty  KOOS  JR
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号