The Use of Cementless Components Does Not Significantly Increase Procedural Costs in Total Knee Arthroplasty |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Hillerød Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark;2. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen E, Denmark;3. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Gentofte Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Niels Andersens vej 65, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark;4. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundModern cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs have shown promising early clinical success; however, concerns exist regarding the higher cost of the cementless implants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the total facility cost of cementless vs traditional cemented TKA along with the effect of cementless fixation on short-term outcomes.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of patients between 2015 and 2017 who underwent either cementless or cemented primary TKA. Itemized facility costs were calculated for every procedure using a time-driven activity-based costing algorithm. Controlling for demographic variables and medical comorbidities, we performed a multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for facility costs following TKA. Short-term outcome metrics including complications, readmissions, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups.ResultsAmong the 2426 primary TKA patients in this study, 119 (4.91%) were performed using cementless implants. When compared to cemented TKA, cementless TKA patients had higher implant costs ($3047.80 vs $2808.73, P < .0001), but lower supply costs ($639.49 vs $815.57, P < .0001) and lower operating room personnel costs ($982.01 vs $1238.26, P < .0001). When controlling for confounding variables, cementless fixation did not have a significant effect on total facility cost or outcomes.ConclusionIn conclusion, the use of cementless TKA implants did not significantly increase total procedural costs when compared to traditional cemented TKA components at our institution. Our data suggest that the increased cost of a cementless implant is recouped through savings in cost of cement and supplies, as well as shorter operative times. The authors encourage investigators at other institutions to use the authors' methodology to evaluate (preferably in a prospective manner) whether the findings from this study can be corroborated. |
| |
Keywords: | total knee arthroplasty cost cementless implants outcomes health economics |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|