Pathologic Versus Native Hip Fractures: Comparing 30-day Mortality and Short-term Complication Profiles

BackgroundA large body of research on native hip fractures has resulted in several evidence-based guidelines aimed at improving postsurgical care for these patients. In contrast, there is a paucity of data on pathologic hip fractures, and whether native hip fracture protocols are generalizable to this population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare mortality rates and complication profiles between patients with pathologic and native hip fractures.MethodsUsing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we identified patients who underwent surgical treatment for pathologic and native hip fractures from 2007 to 2017 and 2601 matched pairs were identified using propensity scoring. Baseline covariates were controlled for, and rates of 30-day postoperative complications and mortality were compared using McNemar’s test.ResultsPathologic hip fracture patients experienced significantly higher rates of death (6.3% vs 4.3%, P < .001), serious adverse events (17.3% vs 13.5%, P < .001), minor complications (34.3% vs 29.1%, P < .001), extended postoperative lengths of stay (30.2% vs 25.9%, P < .001), readmissions (11.9% vs 8.4%, P < .001), thromboembolic complications (3.0% vs 1.6%, P < .001), and perioperative transfusions (31.5% vs 26.4%, P < .001) compared to native hip fracture patients.ConclusionPathologic hip fractures result in significantly higher complication rates than native hip fractures after surgical treatment, suggesting that guidelines for native hip fractures may not be generalizable for pathologic hip fractures. Orthopedic surgeons should closely monitor these patients for deep vein thrombosis, utilize blood sparing techniques, and employ a multidisciplinary approach to help manage and prevent a more heterogenous profile of postsurgical complications.