首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Anaphylaxis following H1N1 pandemic vaccines: safety data in perspective
Authors:Tavares Fernanda  Delaigle Aurelie  Slavin Dorothy  Bauchau Vincent  Fries Louis  Seifert Harry
Affiliation:a GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Wavre, Belgium
b GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, King of Prussia, PA, USA
c GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Columbia, MD, USA
Abstract:We present here a detailed analysis of anaphylaxis cases reported to GlaxoSmithKline safety database following vaccination with its H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccines, Pandemrix™ and Arepanrix™. Cases were assessed according to the Brighton Collaboration Case Definition (BCCD) as either confirmed diagnosis (97/395, 24.6%), insufficient information to fulfil the minimal criteria of the case definition (117/395, 29.6%) or anaphylaxis excluded (181/395, 45.8%). There was no evidence that the rate of anaphylaxis following vaccination with Pandemrix™ or Arepanrix™ is increased with respect to the rates of anaphylaxis for other vaccines. Our analysis also highlighted the challenges of reliably determining the rate of anaphylaxis as an adverse event in the postmarketing setting following mass vaccination, as anaphylaxis was excluded in 45.8% of reported cases.
Keywords:Anaphylaxis   H1N1 pandemic vaccine   Safety   Postmarketing   Brighton Collaboration Case Definition
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号