Validity and reliability of a multiple-group measurement scale for interprofessional collaboration |
| |
| Authors: | Chris Kenaszchuk Scott Reeves David Nicholas Merrick Zwarenstein |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada;(2) Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;(3) Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;(4) Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary (Edmonton Division), Edmonton, Canada;(5) Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada;(6) Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada;(7) Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;(8) Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Background Many measurement scales for interprofessional collaboration are developed for one health professional group, typically nurses.
Evaluating interprofessional collaborative relationships can benefit from employing a measurement scale suitable for multiple
health provider groups, including physicians and other health professionals. To this end, the paper begins development of
a new interprofessional collaboration measurement scale designed for use with nurses, physicians, and other professionals
practicing in contemporary acute care settings. The paper investigates validity and reliability of data from nurses evaluating
interprofessional collaboration of physicians and shows initial results for other rater/target combinations. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
