首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

原发性脑桥出血患者41例预后分析
引用本文:叶祖森,韩钊,黄小亚,樊恺,曹云刚,耿媛媛,景宏菲,黄良通.原发性脑桥出血患者41例预后分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2011,44(9).
作者姓名:叶祖森  韩钊  黄小亚  樊恺  曹云刚  耿媛媛  景宏菲  黄良通
作者单位:1. 325000,温州医学院附属第一医院脑血管科
2. 温州市第二人民医院神经内科
基金项目:温州市科技局基金资助项目
摘    要:目的 探讨原发性脑桥出血患者预后及其影响因素。方法 以温州卒中登记库为基础,前瞻性连续登记2007年4月至2009年4月温州医学院附属第一医院从发病到入院时间<24h,并被诊断为原发性脑桥出血的患者。随访1年,记录患者生存状态。应用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存率分析,应用Cox比例风险模型对可能影响患者1年生存率的因素进行分析。结果 共收集原发性脑桥出血患者41例,男性27例(65.9%),女性14例(34.2%)。截止随方终止时,死亡患者共25例,总病死率为61.0%,中位生存时间为(80.0±54.4) d(95% CI0~186.64)。不同部位的原发性脑桥出血患者1年病死率比较,被盖型(2/11)与基底型(16/22)相比差异有统计学意义(X2 =8.800,P=0.003),被盖型(2/11)与混合型(7/8)相比差异有统计学意义(x2=8.927,P=0.003)。1年生存组平均血肿体积为(3.043±1.718) ml,死亡组平均血肿体积为(5.984±2.707) ml,两组相比,t=3.661,P=0.001。Cox比例风险模型显示,影响原发性脑桥出血患者1年死亡的主要冈素有:血肿部位(RR =2.428,95% CI1.055 ~5.587),血肿体积(RR= 1.283,95%CI1.044- 1.577),入院时GCS 评分(RR= 3.389,95%CI 1.177~9.756)。结论 原发性脑桥出血患者血肿位于脑桥被盖部、血肿体积<4 ml、入院时GCS评分>8分时1年预后较好。

关 键 词:颅内出血  脑干  存活率分析  Kaplan-Meiers评估  比例危险度模型

Analysis of prognosis in 41 patients with primary pontine hemorrhage
YE Zu-sen,HAN Zhao,HUANG Xiao-ya,FAN Kai,CAO Yun-gang,GENG Yuan-yuan,JING Hong-fei,HUANG Liang-tong.Analysis of prognosis in 41 patients with primary pontine hemorrhage[J].Chinese Journal of Neurology,2011,44(9).
Authors:YE Zu-sen  HAN Zhao  HUANG Xiao-ya  FAN Kai  CAO Yun-gang  GENG Yuan-yuan  JING Hong-fei  HUANG Liang-tong
Abstract:Objective To evaluate prognosis and its clinical factors in patients with primary pontine hemorrhage. Methods Patients with primary pontine hemorrhage who were hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College within 24 hours after stroke onset between April 2007 and April 2009 were registered conscutively. The patients were followed up for one year. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyze survival rate. Cox proportional hazards model was used to study risk factors for 1-year mortality. Results A total of 41 patients with primary pontine hemorrhage were studied. Their mean age was (63.5 ± 10. 1 ) years. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 61.0%, the median survival time was (80. 0 ±54.4) days (95% CI 0-186. 64). After one-year follow-up, the mortality rate in patients with primary dorsal pontine hemorrhage( 18.2% ) was significantly lower than that in patients with primary ventral pontine hemorrhage(72. 7% ; x2 = 8. 800, P = 0. 003 ). Patients with massive primary pontine hemorrhage had significantly higher mortality rate than patients with dorsal primary pontine hemorrhage( x2 = 8. 927, P =0. 003). The average hematoma volume of the survivor group and mortality group was (3. 043 ± 1. 718) ml and (5. 984 ± 2. 707) ml, respectively, showing statistical significance (t = 3. 661, P = 0. 001 ). Analysis with Cox proportional hazards model showed that the risk factors associated with mortality were hematoma location ( RR = 2. 428, 95 % CI 1. 055-5. 587 ), hematoma volume ( RR = 1. 283, 95 % CI 1. 044-1. 577 ),GCS score on admission(RR =3. 389, 95% CI 1. 177-9. 756). Patients with pontine hematomas in dorsal had a significantly better outcome than in other locations. Conclusions The survival and prognosis in primary dorsal pontine hemorrhage are better than with hemorrhaging in other parts of pontine. A significant correlation was observed between poor prognosis and hematoma volume, hematoma location and GCS score on admission.
Keywords:Intracranial hemorrhages  Brain stem  Survival analysis  Kaplan-Meiers estimate  Proportional hazards models
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号