无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 张景泉.无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效分析[J].现代保健,2013(8):44-45. |
| |
作者姓名: | 张景泉 |
| |
作者单位: | 四川省峨眉LU市双福镇中心卫生院,四川峨眉山614213 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:探讨无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法:选择2010年1月一2011年12月本院收治的80例患者,按照随机分为研究组38例与对照组42例。研究组采用无张力疝修补术进行治疗,对照组采用传统疝修补术治疗,比较两组患者的住院时间、手术时间、住院费用、术后恢复时间、并发症及复发情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);两组患者的住院时间、住院费用,术后恢复时问比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组并发症发生率、复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:无张力疝修补术操作变捷、并发症少,复发率低、适合在基层医院推广用。
|
关 键 词: | 无张力疝修补术 传统疝修补术 腹股沟疝 疗效 |
Analysis the Curative Effect of Non- tension Herniorrhaphy and Traditional Herniorrhaphy Treatment of Inguinal Hernia |
| |
Authors: | ZHANG Jing-quan |
| |
Institution: | ZHANG Jing-quan |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: To explore the clinic effecy of non- tension herniorrhaphy and traditional herniorrhaphy treatment of inguinal hernia curative. Method: Choose 80 patients in January 2010 to December 2011 were randomly divided into two groups, the rearch group 38 cases and control group 42 cases.The reareeh group take non- tension herniorrhaphy and control group take raditional herniorrhaphy. Compared between the two groups of patients in hospital time,, operation time, charge of hospital, postoperative recovery time, complications and recurrence.Result: Compare operation time of two groups of patients , the difference was not statistically significant ( P〉0.05 ) ; Compared hospital stay, hospital charges, postoperative recovery time of two groups of patients, difference significant, there is statistical significance ( P〈 0.05 ) . Compare complication rates, recurrence rate of two groups of patients, difference significant, there is statistical significance (P〈0.05) .Conclusion: Non- tension herniorrhaphy operation variable rapid, fewer complications, and the recurrence rate is low, the suitable in basic-level hosoitals wilh oromotion. |
| |
Keywords: | Non- tension herniorrhaphy Traditional henaiorrhaphy Inguinal hernia Curative effect |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|