首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中西医结合治疗血管神经性头痛的临床疗效及安全性观察
引用本文:刘力,郭培东.中西医结合治疗血管神经性头痛的临床疗效及安全性观察[J].现代保健,2013(10):12-13.
作者姓名:刘力  郭培东
作者单位:山东省诸城市人民医院,山东诸城262200
摘    要:目的:探讨中西医结合治疗血管神经性头痛的临床应用价值及安全性。方法:将本院收治的86例血管神经性头痛患者随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组给予常规西药治疗,观察组在对照组治疗的基础上给予自拟的止痛活血汤治疗,观察两组的临床疗效和不良反应发生率。结果:观察组临床总有效率为90.7%,对照组临床总有效率为62.8%,两组临床疗效差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为23.3%,对照组不良反应发生率为25.6%,两组安全性差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:中西医结合疗法能显著提高血管神经性头痛的临床疗效,不良反应发生率未见增高,具有重要的临床应用价值。

关 键 词:血管神经性头痛  临床疗效  安全性

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Integrative Therapies for Vascular Headache
Authors:LIU Li  GUO Pei-dong
Institution:.(Medical Innovation of China, 2013)
Abstract:Objective: To explore the clinical value and safety of integrative therapy for angioneurotic headache.Method: 86 cases of patients with angioneurotic headache were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group in our hospital, the control group was given conventional western medicine, the observation group were given the decoction of chinese medicine on the basis of the control group, to observe the ehnical efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions. Result: The total effective rate of the observation group was 90.7%, the total effective rate of the control group was 62.8%, there were significant differences in the two groups ( P〈0.05 ) ; the incidence of adverse reactions of the observation group was 23.3%, the incidence of adverse reactions of the control group was 25.6%, there were no significant differences in the two groups ( P〉0.05 ) .Conclusion: Integrative therapy can significantly improve the clinical efficacy of angioneurotic headache, no change in the incidence of adverse reactions, it has important clinical value.
Keywords:Angioneurotic headache  Clinical efficacy  Security
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号