首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

股骨近端锁定板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较
引用本文:曾德辉,陈辉.股骨近端锁定板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J].南华大学学报(医学版),2011,39(4):438-440.
作者姓名:曾德辉  陈辉
作者单位:1. 南华大学附属南华医院骨科,湖南衡阳,421001
2. 娄底市中心医院急诊科
摘    要:目的比较股骨近端锁定板与DHS治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法 2008年7月~2010年9月手术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折120例,其中采用DHS68例,股骨近端锁定板52例。从手术时间、出血量、临床愈合时间、术后髋关节功能恢复情况及并发症等方面进行比较。结果经术后3~24个月随访,股骨近端锁定板优秀率明显高于DHS组,两组比较差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。结论股骨近端锁定板是理想的股骨粗隆间骨折内固定物之一。

关 键 词:股骨粗隆间骨折  内固定  动力髋螺钉  锁定板
收稿时间:2011/4/22 0:00:00

A Comparative Study of Proximal Femoral Locking Plate and Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Intertrochanteric of Femur
ZENG De-hui,CHEN Hui.A Comparative Study of Proximal Femoral Locking Plate and Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Intertrochanteric of Femur[J].Journal of Nanhua University(Medical Edition),2011,39(4):438-440.
Authors:ZENG De-hui  CHEN Hui
Institution:(Orthopedics Department of the Nanhua Affiliated Hospital,University of South China,Hengyang,Hunan 421001,China)
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of interocha-nteric fractures of the femur using either the proximal femoral locking plate or dynamic hip screw.Methods120 cases of interocha-nteric fratures of the femur from July 2008 to September 2010 were divided into two groups,proximal femoral locking plate group with 52 cases and DHS group with 68 cases.The clinical therapy on the following aspects:median operation time;bloodloss,healing time,function rehabilitation of hip joint and complication were compared,and the collected data were analyzed statistically.ResultThe superiorityrate of proximal femoral locking plate group was more than that of DHS group.The data from above aspects had significant difference(P<0.05).ConclusionProximal femoral locking plate was a good internal fixationin operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.
Keywords:intertrochanteric fracture of femur  internal fixation  dynamic hip screw  locking plate
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号