首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

四肢血管损伤漏诊及再手术的原因探讨
引用本文:张云峰,孙占胜,陈振强.四肢血管损伤漏诊及再手术的原因探讨[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(4):277-279.
作者姓名:张云峰  孙占胜  陈振强
作者单位:山东省青岛市市立医院骨科,266000;山东省立医院骨创伤科
摘    要:目的探讨四肢血管损伤漏诊及再手术的原因。方法回顾性分析了149例四肢血管损伤病人的诊断和治疗方法,寻找漏诊及再手术的原因。结果漏诊8例,漏诊率5.4%,其中彩超诊断错误1例,因肢端皮温好漏诊4例,因可触及动脉搏动漏诊2例,因锐器割伤裂口自行封闭漏诊1例。再手术(再次血管探查)23例,再手术率15.4%,其中,19例因血管栓塞再次手术,4例因所移植的大隐静脉破裂再次手术。结论彩超并非绝对可靠,肢端皮温好不能排除动脉主干断裂,动脉搏动减弱或消失者主张早期探查血管。早期修复血管、正确熟练的镜下操作是手术成功的关键,对大段血管缺损者建议用人造血管移植修复。

关 键 词:血管损伤  漏诊  再手术  四肢血管
修稿时间:2005年9月5日

Reasons for the Missed Diagnosis and Reoperation of Acral Artery Injuries
Zhang Yunfeng,Sun Zhansheng,Chen Zhenqiang.Reasons for the Missed Diagnosis and Reoperation of Acral Artery Injuries[J].Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury,2006,21(4):277-279.
Authors:Zhang Yunfeng  Sun Zhansheng  Chen Zhenqiang
Abstract:Objective To study the reasons for missed diagnosis and reoperation of artery injury in extremities.Methods One hundred and forty-nine cases of acral artery injuries were reviewed retrospectively.The reasons for missed diagnosis and reoperation were studied. Results Eight cases were missed diagnosed (5.4%).one was missed by colorized ultrasonic examination,4 were for normal skin temperature,2 were for touchable artery impulse,and one were for self-closure of split wound by a pointed weapon.Twenty-three cases (15.4%) were operated again.Nineteen were for artery embolism and 4 were for the rupture of the grafted great saphenous vein.Conclusion Colorized ultrasonic examination was not absolutely dependable.The artery breakage could not be excluded by normal skin temperature of extremity end.The artery injuries should be probed as soon as possible.The successful treatment depends on the early repair of artery and the excellent performance under operation microscope.The manmade artery can be used in the case of large of blood vessel defects.
Keywords:Artery injury  Missed diagnosis  Reoperation  Extremities artery
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号