首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

以听力学指标为基础的多元判别函数与耳鸣辨证关系
引用本文:刘蓬,邵美君,曹晓丽. 以听力学指标为基础的多元判别函数与耳鸣辨证关系[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2007, 25(8): 1613-1615
作者姓名:刘蓬  邵美君  曹晓丽
作者单位:1. 广州中医药大学第一附属医院耳鼻喉科,广东,广州,510405
2. 广州市耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科医院,广东,广州,510250
3. 珠海市卫生局,广东,珠海,519000
基金项目:广东省中医药管理局资助项目
摘    要:目的:前瞻性验证前期工作中建立的以听力学指标为基础的多元判别函数对耳鸣辨证的临床价值。方法:选择以主观性耳鸣为主要症状且符合风热侵袭、肝火上扰、痰火郁结、脾胃虚弱、肾精亏损5个证候之一的辨证标准的患者作为研究对象,进行系统的听力学测试取得相关指标,根据过去所建立的以听力学指标为基础的多元判别函数进行客观证型判别,以中医传统辨证作为标准对照,计算客观辨证的敏感度、特异度、准确度。结果:符合标准的耳鸣患者共95例,其中风热侵袭型24例,肝火上扰型14例,痰火郁结型14例,脾胃虚弱型22例,肾精亏损型21例;风热侵袭与肝火上扰型判别函数的敏感度较高(分别为66.7%和64.3%),而特异度亦不低;肾精亏损型判别函数的特异度最高(达94.6%),但敏感度最低(23.8%);痰火郁结和脾胃虚弱型判别函数的敏感度与特异度介于以上3个判别函数之间;5个判别函数的平均准确度为81.7%,平均误判率为18.3%。结论:本组判别函数对风热侵袭与肝火上扰型的判别较为理想,但存在30%左右的漏诊率及15%左右的误诊率;若判为肾精亏损或脾胃虚弱,则可信度也较高;若判为痰火郁结,需慎重考虑可能有一定的误判;若经判别5个证型都不符合,可视为漏诊的肾精亏损而考虑补肾治疗。

关 键 词:听力学指标  多元判别函数  耳鸣  辨证
文章编号:1673-7717(2007)08-1613-03
收稿时间:2007-03-25
修稿时间:2007-03-25

Relationship between the Multiple Discriminant Function Based on Audiology Indexes and Tinnitus Syndrome
LIU Peng,SHAO Mei-jun,CAO Xiao-li. Relationship between the Multiple Discriminant Function Based on Audiology Indexes and Tinnitus Syndrome[J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2007, 25(8): 1613-1615
Authors:LIU Peng  SHAO Mei-jun  CAO Xiao-li
Affiliation:The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of TCM, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong,China; 2. Guangzhou ENT-HN Hospital, Guangzhou 510260, Guangdoug, China; 3, Zhuhu Health Bureau, Zhuhai 519000,Guangdong,China
Abstract:Objective: Prospective certification preparatory work to establish the parameters for the hearing based on the multiple discriminant function of tinnitus dialectical clinical value. Methods: Subjective tinnitus to the main symptoms consistent with Wind thermal invasion, disturbing upward of liver-fire, pyrophlegm blues, weakness of the spleen and stomach, Kidney essence loss five Syndromes, which one of the Diagnostic Criteria for patients as the object of study. systematic audiological tests related indicators, According to the past to establish the parameters for the hearing based on the multiple discriminant function of objective evidence-based discrimination. Differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine as a standard, calculated objective proof sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.Results: To meet the standards of tinnitus patients with a total of 95 cases, of which Wind thermal invasion in 24 cases, disturbing upward of liver-fire in 14 cases, pyrophlegm blues in 14 cases, weakness of the spleen and stomach in 22 cases, Kidney essence loss in 21 cases; Wind thermal invasion with disturbing upward of liver-fire on the interference-discriminant function of a higher sensitivity (66.7% and 64.3%), and the specificity was not low; Kidney essence loss on the interference-discriminant function of the highest specificity (up 94.6 %), However, the minimum sensitivity (23.8%); pyrophlegm blues and weakness of the spleen and stomach on the interference-discriminant function of the sensitivity and specificity between the above three discriminant function ; five discriminant function of the average accuracy was 81.7%, the average rate for the misjudgment of 18.3%. Conclusion: The discriminant function of Wind thermal invasion with disturbing upward of liver-fire on the type of discriminant interference is more ideal, But there are around 30% of the rate of missed diagnosis and 15% misdiagnosis rate; If sentenced it to Kidney essence loss or weakness of the spleen and stomach,Reliability is also higher; If sentenced it to pyrophlegm blues that need to consider carefully.Because it may have some misjudgment. If the five-discriminant can not met, we could consider it as a missed diagnosis of Kidney essence loss and consider to invigorate the kidney.
Keywords:audiology indexes   multiple discriminant function   tinnitus   dialectical
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号