Cerebral ischaemia with unknown onset: Outcome after recanalization procedure

BackgroundStroke of unknown time of onset (UTOS) accounts for one-third of contra-indications for revascularization procedures. With modern neuroimaging techniques it is possible to differentiate the core infarcts and the presence of penumbra.ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes in patients with UTOS, treated with intravenous (i.v.) recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), or both.MethodWe conducted this observational study in patients treated by i.v. rt-PA, MT, or both, selected by a diffusion-weighted image/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch. We evaluated outcomes with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months.ResultsOf 992 consecutive patients (522 women, 52.6%; median age 76 years; median baseline national institutes of health stroke scale NIHSS] 10), 153 (15.4%) had UTOS, including 101 with wake-up strokes. Compared to other patients, they were more likely to have pre-existing mRS scores > 2 (P = 0.022), multiple infarcts (P < 0.001), middle cerebral artery occlusions (P = 0.023), and to undergo MT (P = 0.003), and less likely to receive i.v. rt-PA (P < 0.001). They had higher NIHSS scores (P < 0.001) and longer discovery to treatment initiation times (P < 0.001). They were more likely to develop pulmonary (P = 0.001) and urinary (P = 0.006) infections, and pulmonary embolism (P = 0.019), and tended to have a higher mortality rate (P = 0.052) within 7 days. After adjustment, there was no association of UTOS with any of these outcome measures anymore.ConclusionPatients with UTOS have more severe strokes and more comorbidities, but after adjustment, their outcomes did not differ from those of other patients.