The schilling test cannot be replaced by an absorption test with unlabeled vitamin B12

Summary It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of an oral absorption test using nonlabeled Vit B12 suggested by a commercial distributor as an alternative for the more expensive Schilling test (ST). Plasma levels of Vit B12 were measured with a commercial kit before and 4 h after oral administration of 1 mg Vit B12 in 32 normals, in 16 patients with normal ST, and in 14 patients with abnormal ST for determination of sensitivity and specificity with the ST as golden standard. In normals, a mean of 767±404 pg/ml before and 1096±776 pg/ml after oral Vit B12 with a mean increase of 331±453 pg/ml was measured. Because of the obvious large variation, no meaningful range for normal absorption could be established. In the two patient subsets, there was no Gaussian distribution of the results, with a meridian of Vit B12 increase after absorption of 142 pg/ml, range 27–2668 pg/ml, in the group with normal ST and a meridian of 244 pg/ml ranging from 40 to 2453 pg/ml in the group with abnormal ST. Statistical nonparametric analysis did not reveal any difference between the two groups. Assuming a minimum required increase of 100 pg/ml, as suggested by the kit distributor, a sensitivity of only 27% and a specificity of 75% was obtained. The lack of any diagnostic value of this approach might be caused by the known nonintrinsic-factor mediated absorption of approximately 1% of any B12 given orally even in complete intrinsic factor deficiency and by the relatively large amount of oral Vit B12 needed for a cold absorption test. The latter can, thus, not replace the Schilling test.Abbreviations Vit B12 Vitamin B12