首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

胸腰椎骨折四种不同内固定的生物力学测试与比较
引用本文:周栋,徐南伟,张云坤,王以进. 胸腰椎骨折四种不同内固定的生物力学测试与比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2002, 9(7): 691-693
作者姓名:周栋  徐南伟  张云坤  王以进
作者单位:1. 江苏常州第二人民医院骨科,213000
2. 上海大学生物力学研究所,201800
摘    要:目的:通过生物力学测试,对4种椎弓根内固定器进行评价和比较,以提高脊柱内固定复位内固定效果,使其更符合脊柱生物力学原理,为临床服务。方法:采用新鲜脊柱标本8具,造成胸腰段不稳定骨折,采用4种不同内固定器加以固定,测定它们的生物力学性能,对照比较。结果:胸腰椎骨折采用MRF脊柱内固定,在脊柱强度、刚度和稳定方面比其他3种内固定器械来得强,均具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:采用MRF脊柱内固定器作脊柱固定,既符合生物力学原理,又具有更强的整复固定性能,临床应用前景广阔。

关 键 词:脊柱骨折 内固定器 椎弓根螺钉 生物力学
文章编号:1005-8478(2002)07-0691-03
修稿时间:2001-08-28

A Biomechanical Study of Four Kinds of Spinal Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fracture
ZHOU Dong,XU Nan wei,ZHANG Yun kun,et al.. A Biomechanical Study of Four Kinds of Spinal Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fracture[J]. The Orthopedic Journal of China, 2002, 9(7): 691-693
Authors:ZHOU Dong  XU Nan wei  ZHANG Yun kun  et al.
Affiliation:ZHOU Dong,XU Nan wei,ZHANG Yun kun,et al.Department of Orthopeadics,Changzhou No2Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Changzhou 213000
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate and compare the biomechanism on four kinds of spinal internal fixture.To raise the effect of spinal internal fixation.Let them accord with the biomechanical principle of spine and serve the clinical practice.Method:8 porcine thoracolumbar spinal fracture model were made to study the biomechanical function of 4 internal fixture and compared with each other.Result:MRF device was better than the others in the spinal strength,rigidity and stability test in thoracolumbar spinal fracture.It showed significant differences with them( P <0.01).Conclusion:MRF device not only accorded with the biomechanical principle,but also was one of the best spinal internal fixator in treating the thorocolumbar spinal fractures.It has shown good prospects in clinical practice.
Keywords:Spinal fracture  Internal fixator  Pedicle screw  Biomechanics
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号