首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

初诊2型糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿的影响因素分析
引用本文:顾丽萍,严率,张颖,顾鸣宇,吴艺捷.初诊2型糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿的影响因素分析[J].综合临床医学,2012(6):617-620.
作者姓名:顾丽萍  严率  张颖  顾鸣宇  吴艺捷
作者单位:上海交通大学附属第一人民医院内分泌代谢科,200080
摘    要:目的分析初诊2型糖尿病(T2DM)住院患者微量白蛋白尿的发生率及危险因素,为糖尿病及慢性微血管并发症的早期干预提供理论依据。方法2006年3月至2009年9月在我院内分泌代谢科住院且资料完整的286例初诊T2DM患者,测定其血脂、24h尿白蛋白、空腹及餐后胰岛素和血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)以及C肽等。两次24h尿白蛋白定量为30—300mg被定义为微量白蛋白尿。计算胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)。所有患者均由眼科医师进行扩瞳后眼底检查明确有无眼底病变。结果(1)本研究人群中,微量白蛋白尿的发生率为19.58%(56/286)。(2)正常蛋白尿组与微量白蛋白尿组合并糖尿病视网膜病变者分别占19.57%(45/230)与33.93%(19/56),差异有统计学意义(x2=5.349,P=0.021);微量白蛋白尿组的空腹血糖、HbA1c、HOMA-IR均显著高于正常蛋白尿组空腹血糖:(11.08±1.76)、(9.24±1.65)mmol/L,HbA1c:(11.54±1.59)%、(9.39±1.64)%,HOMA—IR:(3.73±0.42)、(3.50±0.30),t值分别为-6.148、-7.533、-3.774,P均〈0.001]。(3)Pearson相关分析显示,微量白蛋白尿与空腹血糖(r=0.460)、HbA1c(r=0.499)、HOMA—IR(r=0.308)、合并糖尿病视网膜病变(r=0.405)呈正相关(P均〈0.01)。(4)逐步回归分析显示,空腹血糖(β=-0.804,P〈0.01)、HbAle(β=-0.455,P〈0.01)、合并糖尿病视网膜病变(β=1.527,P〈0.05)是影响糖尿病微量白蛋白尿的独立危险因素。结论初诊住院T2DM患者微量白蛋白尿的发生与空腹血糖、HbA1c、HOMA—IR相关,同时更容易合并糖尿病视网膜病变。

关 键 词:2型糖尿病  微量白蛋白尿  影响因素

Risk factors analysis of microalbuminuria in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors:GU Li-ping  YAN Shuai  ZHANG Ying  GU Ming-yu  WU Yi-jie
Institution:. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200080, China
Abstract:Objective To analyze the incidence and risk factors of microalbuminuria in newly diagnosed and hospitalized type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, and to provide the theoretical basis for therapy of diabetes and diabetic chronic complications. Methods The blood glucose, lipid profile, 24h-urinaryalbumin, fasting and postprandial serum insulin and peptid C were measured in 286 newly diagnosed and hospitalized type 2 diabetic patients from Mar. 2006 to Sep. 2009. Microalbuminuria was defined as the 24h-urinary albumin between 30 to 300 mg twice. Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) was recorded and all the patients received fundus examination by ophthalmologists after expansion of the pupil to ensure whether there was retinopathy or not. Results ( 1 ) The incidence rate of microalbuminuria in this study was 19. 58% (56/286). (2) Normal albuminuria group and MA group combined DR were 19. 57% (45/230) and 33.93% (19/56) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant( Х^2 = 5. 349, P = 0. 021 ). Compared with control, the FPG, HbAlc and HOMA-IR were significantly higher in microalbuminuria group ( FPG: 11.08 ± 1.76 ] mmol/L vs 9. 24 ± 1.65]mmol/L,t= -6.148,P〈0.001;HbAlc:11.54±1.591% vs 9.39±1.641%,t= -7.533,P〈 0. 001 ; HOMA-IR : 3.73 ± 0.42 ] vs 3.50 ± 0. 30 ], t = - 3. 774, P 〈 0. 001 ). ( 3 ) Pearson correlation analysis revealed mieroalbuminuria was positively correlated with FPG ( r.= 0. 460 ) , HbAle ( r = 0. 499 ), HOMA-IR ( r = 0. 308 ) and combined DR ( r = 0. 405 ) ( P 〈 0.01 ). (4) Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that FPG (β = - 0. 804, P 〈 0. 01 ), HbAle (/3 = - 0. 455, P 〈 0. 01 ) and combined DR (β = 1. 527, P 〈 0. 05 ) were independently risk factors of microalbuminuria. Conclusion The development of microalbuminuria in newly diagnosed and hospitalized type 2 diabetic patients is associated with FPG, HbAlc and HOMA-IR, and will be easier to merge diabetic retinopathy.
Keywords:Type 2 diabetes mellitus  Microalbuminuria  Risk factors
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号