电针加刺络拔罐治疗颈椎病的对比观察研究

目的观察电针加刺络拔罐法治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法将180例颈椎病患者按简单随机法分为治疗组（电针加刺络拔罐）、对照组（单纯刺络拔罐），每组90例，观察两组疗效及平均治疗时间。结果治疗组临床痊愈率为44．4％，总有效率为95．6％，对照组临床痊愈率为30．0％，总有效率为92．2％，两组临床痊愈率比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）：治疗组所有病例和痊愈病例平均治疗时间均较对照组为短，两者差异有统计学意义（均P〈0．05）。结论电针加刺络拔罐法治疗颈椎病临床痊愈率优于单纯剌络拔罐治疗，且能减少治疗时间。

Comparative Study of Electroacupuncture plus Pricking-cupping Bloodletting Method for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis

Objective To investigate the efficacy of electroacnpuncture plus pricking-cupping bloodletting method in treating cervical spondylosis. Methods One hundred and eighty patients with cervical spondylosis were allocated by simple randomization to a treatment group （electroacupuncture plus pricking-cupping bloodletting method） and control group （pricking-cupping bloodletting method alone）, 90 cases each. The therapeutic effect and the mean treatment time were observed in the two groups. Results The clinical recovery rate and the total efficacy rate were 46.7% and 95.6%, respectively, in the treatment group and 30.0% and 92.2%, respectively, in the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in the clinical recovery rate between the two groups （P〈0.05）. The mean treatment times for all the patients and the recovery patients were shorter in the treatment group than in the control group. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups （both P〈0.05）. Conclusion Electroacupuncture plus pricking-cupping bloodletting method has a higher clinical recovery rate in treating cervical spondylosis than pricking-cupping bloodletting method alone and can reduce the treatment time.