首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Diagnostic markers in combination improve the identification of growth-restricted neonates
Authors:Sifianou Popi  Ktena Vasso  Karga Helen
Institution:
  • a Dept. of Neonatology, General and Maternity Hospital, “Elena Venizelou”, Athens, Greece
  • b 2nd Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Abstract:

    Background

    The identification of growth-restricted neonates is hampered by the lack of an appropriate diagnostic tool.

    Aim

    To determine the value of combining diagnostic markers in detecting growth-restricted neonates.

    Methods

    A set of anthropometric indices, nutritional status and placental weight were assessed in the study population soon after birth. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and its binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) were assayed in cord blood. Babies having low values (≤25th centile for gestational age) in 0, 1 or more of four anthropometric indices were classified as Group250, Group251 and Group252, respectively. For statistical evaluation the Mann-Whitney test and a multiple regression analysis were performed.

    Results

    One hundred-eighty (180) singleton babies of over 36 weeks of gestational age (GA) were studied. IGF-I, IGFBP-3 levels and placental weight were significantly lower in Group252 than both Group250 (P < 0.0001) and Group251 (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.03). Group251 and Group250 did not differ significantly regarding IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels (p values 0.09 and 0.13, respectively). The combination of anthropometric indices enhanced their ability to predict IGF-I, IGFBP-3 levels and placental weight; the nutritional status of the babies added power to all individual models in predicting the three outcome variables. Analogous results were obtained when the 10th (instead of the 25th) centile for GA was used for the anthropometric indices.

    Conclusion

    The combination of simple diagnostic markers of growth restriction can define a reference test with enhanced diagnostic potential compared to the potential of the same markers in isolated use.
    Keywords:AC  abdominal circumference  BL  birth length  BMI  body mass index  BW  birth weight  CANS  clinical assessment of nutritional status  CC  chest circumference  GA  gestational age  HC  head circumference  IGF-I  insulin-like growth factor I  IGFBP-3  insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3  IUGR  intrauterine growth restriction  MAC  mid-arm circumference  PI  ponderal index
    本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
    设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

    Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号