首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The development and psychometric validation of a brain cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for use in combination with general cancer-specific questionnaires
Authors:D. Osoba  N. K. Aaronson  M. Muller  K. Sneeuw  M. -A. Hsu  W. K. A. Yung  M. Brada  E. Newlands
Affiliation:(1) British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;(2) University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;(3) Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;(4) Integrated Therapeutics Group, Inc., a subsidiary of Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA;(5) MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA;(6) Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, UK;(7) Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK;(8) Quality of Life Program, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10 Avenue, V5Z 4E6 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Abstract:A self-report questionnaire module consisting of 24 items, comprising 5 scales and 7 single items, has been developed for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with brain cancer. Module development proceeded through several stages, including a listing of patient, family and health care professional concerns, the writing of items, field testing in 105 patients with brain cancer and subsequent item reduction and scale construction after multitrait scaling analysis and assessment of internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient agr). The final version of the module exhibits reasonable test-retest stability over a period of one week. Differences in the responses between patients with recently-diagnosed and recurrent cancer and between patients with a Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of 50–70 and 80–100 were in the expected direction, indicating that the module of questions is responsive to differing conditions. Patients with either mental confusion, motor deficit or dysphasia indicated problems in several domains and single items as compared to patients without these neurological deficits. Thus, differences in the responses to the items in the brain cancer module appear to reflect differences in neurological status. In adclition, deteriorating neurological status was accompanied by a marked increase in emotional distress, future uncertainty and motor dysfunction. A comparison of the responses in the module with the KPS and with a modified Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index (BADLI) shows moderate correlations, primarily with scales and items that pertain to motor dysfunction, while other scales (such as emotional distress, visual disorder and communication deficit) and most single items are not associated with the KPS or BADLI. Since the emotional distress scale of the module was found to be highly correlated with the emotional function scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, it could be omitted when the module is used in combination with the QLQ-C30. This would reduce the module to a total of 20 items with four scales and seven single items. The intention is to combine this module of questions with other core or general quality-of-life questionnaires when studying patients with brain cancer in clinical trials.M.-A. Hsu is currently with Pfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Keywords:Brain cancer  brain cancer module  known groups comparisons  quality of life  scale reliability
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号