首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Potentiation by vasopressin of adrenergic vasoconstriction in the rat isolated mesenteric artery
Authors:I Noguera  P Medina  G Segarra  M C Martínez  M Aldasoro  J M Vila  S Lluch
Institution:Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain;*Unidad Central de Investigación, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
Abstract:
  1. The aim of the present study was to investigate in rat mesenteric artery rings whether low concentrations of vasopressin could modify the contractile responses to noradrenaline and electrical stimulation of perivascular nerves.
  2. Vasopressin (10−10–10−7M) caused concentration-dependent contractions (pD2=8.36±0.09). The V1-receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP (10−9–10−8M) produced parallel rightward shifts of the control curve for vasopressin. Schild analysis yielded a pA2 value of 9.83 with a slope of 1.10±0.14.
  3. Vasopressin (3×10 −10 and 10−9M) caused concentration-dependent potentiation of the contractions elicited by electrical stimulation (2–8 Hz; 0.2 ms duration for 30 s) and produced leftward shifts of the concentration-response curve for noradrenaline. The V1-receptor antagonist induced concentration-dependent inhibitions of potentiation induced by vasopressin. The selective V1-receptor agonist [Phe*, Orn8]-vasotocin (3×10 −10 and 10−9M) induced potentiation of electrical stimulation-evoked responses which was also inhibited in the presence of the V1 antagonist (10−8M). In contrast, the V2-receptor agonist deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (desmopressin 10−8–10−7M) did not modify the electrical stimulation-induced responses and the V2-receptor antagonist [d(CH2)5, D-Ile*, Ile4, Arg8]-vasopressin (10−8–10−7M) did not affect the potentiation evoked by vasopressin.
  4. In artery rings contracted by 10−6M noradrenaline in the presence of 10−6M guanethidine and 10−6M atropine, electrical stimulation (2, 4 and 8 Hz) produced frequency-dependent relaxations which were unaffected by 10−9M vasopressin but abolished by 10−6M tetrodotoxin.
  5. Vasopressin also potentiated contractions elicited by KCl and contractions induced by addition of CaCl2 to KCl depolarized vessels. The augmenting effects were inhibited by the V1 antagonist.
  6. In the presence of the calcium antagonist nifedipine (10−6M), vasopressin failed to enhance the contractile responses to electrical stimulation, noradrenaline and KCl.
  7. The results demonstrate that low concentrations of vasopressin strongly potentiate the contractions to adrenergic stimulation and KCl depolarization. This effect appears to be mediated by V1 receptor stimulation which brings about an increase in calcium entry through dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels.
Keywords:Rat mesenteric artery  V1 and V2 vasopressin receptors  vasopressin antagonists  adrenergic nerve stimulation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号