| 超临界CO2萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取当归挥发油的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李桂生,马成俊,等.超临界CO2萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取当归挥发油的比较[J].医学教育探索,2001(7):581-583. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李桂生 马成俊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 李桂生（山东省天然药物工程技术研究中心山东绿叶制药股份有限公司，山东烟台
264003）;马成俊（山东省天然药物工程技术研究中心山东绿叶制药股份有限公司，山东烟台
264003）;刘志峰（山东省天然药物工程技术研究中心山东绿叶制药股份有限公司，山东烟台
264003）;刘珂（山东省天然药物工程技术研究中心山东绿叶制药股份有限公司，山东烟台
264003） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 考察当归挥发油的不同提取方法。方法 超临界CO2流体萃取法及水蒸气蒸馏法。结果 两者的成分及（Z）－藁本内酯的含量基本一致，而超临界CO2萃取所得当归油的收率约为水蒸气蒸馏收率的2倍。结论 超临界CO2流体萃取法是当归挥发油较好的提取方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 超临界CO2流体 水蒸气蒸馏 当归挥发油 萃取 |
| 修稿时间： | 1/8/2001 12:00:00 AM |
Extraction of essential oil from Angelica sinensis by supercritical-CO2
fluid in comparison with that by steam distillation |
| |
| LI Gui-sheng,MA Cheng-jun,LIU Zhi-feng,LIU Ke.Extraction of essential oil from Angelica sinensis by supercritical-CO2
fluid in comparison with that by steam distillation[J].Researches in Medical Education,2001(7):581-583. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Gui-sheng MA Cheng-jun LIU Zhi-feng LIU Ke |
| |
| Abstract: | Object To compare the two different methods for the extraction of essential oil from Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels. Methods The essential oil of A. sinensis were extracted by supercritical-CO 2 fluid (SF-CO 2) and by steam distillation (SD) separately. Results The components and contents of (Z)-ligustilide of the essential oil extracted by both methods were identical, but the yield by SF-CO 2 is twice as much as that by SD. Conclusion The results suggested that extraction of essential oil from A. sinensis by SF-CO 2 is more satisfactory. |
| |
| Keywords: | supercritical-CO 2 fluid steam distillation essential oil of Angelica sinensis (Oliv ) Diels |
|
| 点击此处可从《医学教育探索》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《医学教育探索》下载免费的PDF全文 |
