Endovascular stent-graft treatment of aortic dissection: determinants of post-interventional outcome. |
| |
Authors: | Holger Eggebrecht Ulf Herold Oliver Kuhnt Axel Schmermund Thomas Bartel Stefan Martini Alexander Lind Christoph K Naber Peter Kienbaum Hilmar Kühl Jürgen Peters Heinz Jakob Raimund Erbel Dietrich Baumgart |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart Centre Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany. holger.eggebrecht@uni-essen.de |
| |
Abstract: | AIMS: To investigate the results of endovascular stent-graft placement for the treatment of patients with type B aortic dissection (B-AD). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (62+/-10 years, 32 male) with acute (n=10) and chronic (n=28) type B-AD were treated with endovascular stent-grafts. The implantation procedure was successful in all patients. Peri-procedural non-fatal complications occurred in four (11%) patients. Overall, 4/38 (11%) patients died during the in-hospital period. Patients undergoing stent-graft placement for acute AD had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality than patients with chronic AD (40 vs. 0%, P=0.001). During a median follow-up of 18 (1-57) months, there were six additional deaths. Overall survival rates were 97.4+/-2.6% at 30 days, 80.4+/-6.7% at 1 year, 73.2+/-7.8% at 2 years, and 54.9+/-16.9% at 4 years. Patients with a poor clinical health status (ASA class > 3) had a significantly reduced life expectancy compared with patients with only moderate co-morbidities (ASA class = 3) (1-year survival rate 28.6+/-17.1 vs. 92.6+/-6.7%, P=0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that a poor clinical health status (ASA>3) pre-operatively (HR=29.5, 95% CI 1.5-581.9, P=0.026) and increased age (HR=1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, P=0.084) were independent determinants of post-interventional mortality. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stent-graft treatment is a safe alternative for patients with AD. The pre-operative clinical health status of the patient is the most important determinant of post-interventional outcome. Careful patient selection is thus of particular importance. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|