Human uterodomes (pinopods) do not display pinocytotic function |
| |
Authors: | Adams S M Gayer N Hosie M J Murphy C R |
| |
Affiliation: | Departments of Anatomy & Histology and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. susan@anatomy.usyd.edu.au |
| |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: The term 'pinopod' or 'pinopode' has been used indiscriminately since the 1970s to describe most apical structures on uterine epithelial cells and as such suggests a cross species structural functionality. This study looks at the apical cellular protrusions in rats and humans and compares their pinocytotic ability. METHODS: We have utilized standard tracer techniques in an attempt to determine the functionality of the uterine surface protrusions in the human based on results reported in rats. RESULTS: Pinopods in rat tissue demonstrated tracer uptake, but no tracer uptake in the apical protrusions of human uterine epithelium was evident. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the uterine surface protrusions observed in the human are not pinocytotic and therefore probably perform a function different from similar structures observed in rats and mice. This highlights the need to alter nomenclature from pinopods to uterodomes. |
| |
Keywords: | colloidal gold/human/pinocytosis/pinopods/rats |
本文献已被 PubMed Oxford 等数据库收录! |