首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

怀特利指数中文版的信度效度分析
引用本文:怀特利指数中文版的信度效度分析.怀特利指数中文版的信度效度分析[J].首都医学院学报,2019,40(5):671-676.
作者姓名:怀特利指数中文版的信度效度分析
作者单位:1. 首都医科大学附属北京安定医院 国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心 精神疾病诊断与治疗北京市重点实验室, 北京 100088;2. 首都医科大学人脑保护高精尖创新中心, 北京 100069;3. 天津市安定医院心理门诊, 天津 300222;4. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院心理科, 北京 100020;5. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院心理科, 北京 100730;6. 清华大学玉泉医院临床心理科, 北京 100040
基金项目:首都卫生发展科研专项项目(2016-1-2121),高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20131107110012110102001100),北京市医院管理局临床医学发展专项“扬帆”计划(ZYLX201815)。
摘    要:目的 评估怀特利指数中文版(Whiteley Index-Chinese Version,WI-CV)的心理测量学特征。方法 依据ICD-10诊断标准选取抑郁症、广泛性焦虑障碍、惊恐障碍、强迫症、躯体形式障碍共291例,以及正常被试190例,填写WI-CV、疾病态度量表中文版(Illness Attitude Scale-Chinese Version,IAS-CV)、贝克抑郁量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ,BDI-Ⅱ)和贝克焦虑量表(Beck Anxiety Inventory,BAI)。结果 WI-CV探索性因子分析产生3个因子,分别是疾病信念,疾病恐惧和躯体先占观念;WI-CV总分和IAS-CV、BAI、BDI-Ⅱ得分呈正相关(r=0.69、0.50、0.38,P<0.01);躯体形式障碍组WI-CV得分高于抑郁症组、其他焦虑障碍组、强迫症组和正常被试组[(7.24±2.89)分vs(4.77±2.99)分、(5.07±3.05)分、(5.91±2.73)分、(2.52±2.58)分,均P<0.05]。WI-CV总分和各因子的Pearson相关为0.91、0.76、0.76;WI-CV总分的Cronbach's α系数为0.82,各因子Cronbach's α系数为0.53~0.71,WI-CV分半系数为0.83,各因子的分半系数为0.59~0.74。结论 WI-CV具有良好的心理测量学特性,可在临床和研究工作中试用。

关 键 词:怀特利指数  信度  效度  
收稿时间:2019-07-04

Reliability and validity of the whiteley index-Chinese version
Su Xue,Li Zhanjiang,Long Jing,Zu Si,Zhang Yanbo,Xu Bo.Reliability and validity of the whiteley index-Chinese version[J].Journal of Capital University of Medical Sciences,2019,40(5):671-676.
Authors:Su Xue  Li Zhanjiang  Long Jing  Zu Si  Zhang Yanbo  Xu Bo
Abstract:Objective To the psychometric characteristics of patients bothered by anxiety disorder with the Chinese Version of the scale Whiteley Index (WI-CV). Methods Totally we enrolled 291 patients with somatoform disorders, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder diagnosed with ICD-10 from five hospitals in Beijing, and 190 normal people were enrolled as the control. They were assessed with WI-CV, Chinese Version of Illness Attitude Scale(IAS-CV), Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ(BDI-Ⅱ), and Beck Anxiety Inventory(BAI). Results The exploratory factor analysis resulted in 12 items and finally three factors, disease conviction, disease phobia, and bodily preoccupation. The total score of WI-CV was correlated with IAS-CV scores (r=0.69, P<0.01), BAI scores (r=0.50, P<0.01) and BDI-Ⅱ scores (r=0.38, P<0.01). Factor disease convince was correlated with IAS-CV scores (r=0.60, P<0.01), BAI scores (r=0.51, P<0.01) and BDI-Ⅱ scores (r=0.39, P<0.01). Factor disease phobia was correlated with IAS-CV scores (r=0.60, P<0.01), BAI scores (r=0.25, P<0.01) and BDI-Ⅱ scores (r=0.14, P>0.01).Factor bodily preoccupation was correlated with IAS-CV scores (r=0.49, P<0.01), BAI scores (r=0.41, P<0.01) and BDI-Ⅱ scores (r=0.37, P<0.0 1). Patients with somatoform disorders (7.24±2.89) had higher scores than patients with other disorder, such as depression (4.77±2.99), anxiety (5.07±3.05), obsessive compulsive disorder (5.91±2.73), and normal controls (2.52±2.58). Obsessive compulsive disorder had higher scores than other four disorders. Normal controls get the lowest score than other patients. The Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.82 for WI-CV total score and 0.53-0.71 for each subscale. Pearson coefficient measured between total score and factor score were 0.91, 0.76, and 0.76. Split-half coefficient of WI-CV was 0.83, and Split-half coefficient of subscales were 0.59-0.74. Conclusion It suggested that the WI-CV has good psychometric features and it may be trialed in clinical practice and research in China.
Keywords:Whiteley Index  reliability  validity  
点击此处可从《首都医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《首都医学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号