首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基于因子分析法的中国高校临床医学科研竞争力评价研究
引用本文:基于因子分析法的中国高校临床医学科研竞争力评价研究.基于因子分析法的中国高校临床医学科研竞争力评价研究[J].首都医学院学报,2019,40(4):615-620.
作者姓名:基于因子分析法的中国高校临床医学科研竞争力评价研究
作者单位:首都医科大学图书馆, 北京 100069
摘    要:目的 选取50所参与2012年学科评估的高等学校,对其临床医学科研竞争力进行评价。方法 选取Web of Science论文数、学科规范化引文影响力(category normalized citation impact,CNCI)、被引频次、论文被引百分比、被引次数排名前1%的论文百分比、被引次数排名前10%的论文百分比、热门论文百分比、H指数、国际合作论文数、F1000论文数十个指标,应用SPSS软件进行因子分析法,提取两个公共因子,计算综合得分来分析各高校科研竞争力。结果 从科研生产力规模量来看,前三位的学校是上海交通大学、北京大学和复旦大学;从科研高影响力来看,排在前三位的是南京大学、宁波大学和南京中医药大学。从综合性的科研竞争力来看,排在前十位的是上海交通大学、北京大学、复旦大学、中山大学、北京协和医学院、首都医科大学、南京医科大学、南京大学、中南大学、浙江大学。结论 建议各个高校根据学科发展的实际情况,从科研生产力规模量和科研高影响力两个方面提高临床医学科研竞争力。

关 键 词:因子分析法  中国高校  临床医学  科研竞争力  
收稿时间:2019-02-28

An evaluation of scientific research competitiveness of clinical medicine subject in Chinese universities based on factor analysis
Liu Yuting,Huang Fang.An evaluation of scientific research competitiveness of clinical medicine subject in Chinese universities based on factor analysis[J].Journal of Capital University of Medical Sciences,2019,40(4):615-620.
Authors:Liu Yuting  Huang Fang
Institution:Capital Medical University Library, Beijing 100069, China
Abstract:Objective Selected 50 universities which have participated in the 2012 subject evaluation, to evaluate the competitiveness of its clinical research. Methods Selected the number of Web of Science documents, category normalized citation impact (CNCI), times cited, percentage of documents cited, percentage of documents cited in the top 1%, percentage of documents cited in the top 10%,percentage of hot papers. H index, the number of international cooperation papers, the number of F1000 documents index, based on factor analysis by SPSS software, two common factors were extracted, and comprehensive scores were calculated to analyze the scientific research competitiveness of the universities. Results From the perspective of the scale of scientific research productivity, the top three universities were Shanghai Jiaotong University, Peking University, and Fudan University. From the perspective of the high impact of scientific research, the top three universities were Nanjing University, Ningbo University and Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. From the perspective of comprehensive scientific research competitiveness, the top ten universities were Shanghai Jiaotong University, Peking University, Fudan University, Sun Yat Sen University, Peking Union Medical College, Capital Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing University, Central South University, Zhejiang the University. Conclusion It is suggested that each university should improve the competitiveness of clinical medical research from the aspects of the scale of scientific research productivity and the high impact of scientific research according to the actual situation of subject development.
Keywords:factor analysis  Chinese universities  clinical medicine  research competitiveness  
点击此处可从《首都医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《首都医学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号