首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

科华ELISA与雅培i2000sr检测系统对4种感染性疾病8项血清标志物检测的性能评价
引用本文:汪靖园,王林川,肖 尧,阮竞雄,田旭东,闫 芳.科华ELISA与雅培i2000sr检测系统对4种感染性疾病8项血清标志物检测的性能评价[J].现代检验医学杂志,2018,0(6):125-131.
作者姓名:汪靖园  王林川  肖 尧  阮竞雄  田旭东  闫 芳
作者单位:1.西安交通大学第一附属医院检验科,西安 710061; 2.西安市第三医院输血科,西安 710018
摘    要:目的 对科华ELISA和雅培i2000sr检测系统4种感染性疾病8项血清学标志物的性能进行评价和比较。方法 采用美国临床和实验室标准协会(clinical and laboratory standards institute,CLSI)评价方案(evaluation protocols,EP)评价两种检测系统性能。评价内容包括:准确度、检出限、一致性、精密度、线性范围。结果 两种检测系统的准确度均为100%。HBsAg,HBsAb,HBeAg,HBeAb,HBcAb,Anti-HCV,梅毒特异性抗体及(Anti-TP)Anti-HIV的检出限科华分别为0.08IU/ml,10mIU/ml,0.8NCU/ml,4.4NCU/ml,3.2NCU/ml,0.8NCU/ml,20 mIU/ml和0.5 NCU/ml; 雅培分别为0.05 IU/ml,10 mIU/ml,0.23 NCU/ml,1 NCU/ml,1.8 NCU/ml,0.45 NCU/ml,20 mIU/ml和2.88 NCU/ml。一致性验证:两种系统方法学比对Kappa值分布于0.8~0.9,定性项目仪器间比对Kappa值均为1, 定量项目(HBsAg,HBsAb)仪器间比对观察误差<1/2TEa,浓度误差指数绝对值<1。精密度评价:批内变异系数(CV)范围为1.10%~7.01%,室内CV范围为1.90%~10.03%。雅培i2000sr HBsAg,HBsAb线性范围分别为0.73~245IU/ml和4.21~960.89mIU/ml。结论 科华ELISA和雅培i2000sr准确度、检出限、一致性、精密度和线性范围与厂家声明一致并能满足实验室要求。两种系统HBsAg,HBsAb,Anti-TP检出限接近,但HBeAg,HBeAb,HBcAb,Anti-HCV和Anti-HIV检出限二者存在较大差异。

关 键 词:科华ELISA  雅培i2000sr  血清标志物  性能评价

Performance Evaluation of Kehua ELISA and Abbott i2000sr in Eight Serum Markers Detection for Four Infectious Diseases
WANG Jing-yuan,WANG Lin-chuan,XIAO Yao,RUAN Jing-xiong,TIAN Xu-dong,YAN Fang.Performance Evaluation of Kehua ELISA and Abbott i2000sr in Eight Serum Markers Detection for Four Infectious Diseases[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2018,0(6):125-131.
Authors:WANG Jing-yuan  WANG Lin-chuan  XIAO Yao  RUAN Jing-xiong  TIAN Xu-dong  YAN Fang
Institution:1.Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710061,China; 2.Department of Blood Transfusion,Xi'an No.3 Hospital,Xi'an 710018,China
Abstract:Objective The present study was carried out toevaluate the performance of Kehua ELISA and Abbott i2000sr for eight serum markers detection.Methods The performances,i.e.,accuracy,limit of detection(LOD),consistency,precision and linear range were evaluated according with the CLSI EP documents.Results The accuracy of the two systems were 100%.The LOD of HBsAg,HBsAb,HBeAg,HBeAb,HBcAb,Anti-HCV,Anti-TP and Anti-HIV were 0.08IU/ml,10mIU/ml,0.8NCU/ml,4.4NCU/ml,3.2NCU/ml,0.8NCU/ml,20mIU/ml and 0.5NCU/ml for Kehua,and 0.05IU/ml,10mIU/ml,0.23NCU/ml,1NCU/ml,1.8NCU/ml,0.45NCU/ml,20mIU/ml and 2.88NCU/ml for Abbott,respectively.The consistency test showed that the Kappa value was 0.8 to 0.9 for method comparison and 1 for instruments comparison.Multipleinstruments comparison for HBsAg and HBsAb,the observed error was <1/2TEa anderror index by concentration was <1.The coefficients of variations(CV)ofwithin-run and laboratory precision were 1.10%~7.01% and 1.90~10.03%,respectively.The linear ranges of HBsAg and HBsAb were 0.73~245IU/ml and 4.21~960.89mIU/ml,respectively.Conclusion The performances oftwo systems,such as LOD,consistency,precision and linear range,were consistent with manufacturer's declaration and met the clinical requirements.Kehua was close to i2000sr on the detection ability of HBsAg,HBsAb and Anti-TP, however,obvious difference in the detection ability of HBeAg,HBeAb,HBcAb, Anti-HCV and anti-HIV was observed between two systems.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代检验医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代检验医学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号