Thoughts about encounters between nondisabled and disabled peers: Situational constraints,states-of-mind,valenced thought categories

This study explores three issues: thoughts and feelings of individuals with and without physical disabilities concerning encounters in different situations, ways of grouping self-statements into valenced categories, and use of states-of-mind (SOM) ratios as an alternative to positive and negative thought frequencies. Data from 127 able-bodied and 46 physically disabled college students indicate that, in everyday social encounters, nondisabled individuals' thoughts and feelings were more negative, while those of disabled individuals were more negative when helping was involved and when encounters centered on the impairment. Thus, problematic encounters between people with and without disabilities may be due to the reactions of individuals with disabilities in situations which involve help, and to reactions of able-bodied persons in everyday contexts. The data also confirm the utility of SOM ratios as an alternative to valenced frequencies in cognitive assessment: SOM scores discriminated groups when situational demands were manipulated and scores were linearly related to criterion measures. However, SOM ratios differed dramatically, depending on the attentional focus of thoughts. The findings illustrate types of thoughts which occur during interaction between people with and without disabilities, demonstrate a simple technique for grouping thoughts into valenced categories on an empirical basis, and highlight the relative contribution of cognitive and affective elements to overall valenced scores. Implications for research on assessment of self-statements are discussed and recommendations are made concerning programming to facilitate the social integration of people with disabilities.This research was supported by grants to the first author from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and from Fonds F.C.A.R. pour l'aide et le soutien à la recherche. Thanks are due to Meribah Aikens, Maria Barile, Leo Bissonette, Bosco Daude, Jim Dubois, Lillian Fox, Evelyn Gold, Naomi Goodz, Darlene Judd, André Leblanc, John Martos, Sue McKenzie, Irwin Slopak, and Joan Wolforth for their assistance with various stages of this investigation.