64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the visualization of different coronary artery stents and the delineation of in-stent stenoses using 64- and 16-slice multidector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 different coronary stents with a simulated in-stent stenosis were placed in a vascular phantom and scanned with a 16-slice and a 64-slice MDCT at orientations of 0 degree, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees relative to the scanner's z-axis. Visible lumen diameter and attenuation in the stented and the unstented segment of the phantom were measured. Three readers assessed stenosis delineation and visualization of the residual lumen using a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was significantly reduced with 64-slice CT compared with 16-slice CT. At an angle of 0 degree, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees relative to the scanner's z-axis, the ALN for 16-slice CT was 42.2%, 39.8%, and 44.0% using a slice-thickness of 1.0 mm and 40.9%, 40.4%, and 41.6% using a slice thickness of 0.75 mm, respectively. With 64-slice CT, the ALN was 39.1%, 37.3%, and 36.0% at the respective angles. The differences between attenuation values in the stented and unstented segment of the tube were significantly lower for 64-slice CT. Mean visibility scores were significantly higher for 64-slice CT. CONCLUSION: Use of the 64-slice CT results in superior visualization of the stent lumen and in-stent stenosis compared with 16-slice CT, especially when the stent is orientated parallel to the x-ray beam.