首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Double-blind study to evaluate efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg versus mefenamic acid 1500 mg in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea
Authors:de Mello Nilson Roberto  Baracat Edmund Chada  Tomaz Geraldez  Bedone Aloísio José  Camargos Aroldo  Barbosa Ione Cristina  de Souza Rosival Nassar  Rumi Demetrio Ortega  Martinez Alcala Felix Octavio  Velasco Jorge Antonio Aldrete  Cortes Roberto Jose Risco
Affiliation:University of S?o Paulo, S?o Paulo City, Brazil.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Assessment of efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg once a day (o.a.d.) compared with mefenamic acid 500 mg three times a day (t.i.d.), over a treatment period of 3-5 days, during three menstrual cycles, for primary dysmenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, multinational, double-blind, double-dummy, three parallel groups, randomized trial, phase IIb, 337 patients. Treatment group comparisons of continuous variables were carried out using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Efficacy was analyzed using Fisher and chi(2)-tests. RESULTS: Meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg showed a similar profile in pain reduction and dysmenorrhea symptoms when compared with mefenamic acid. Thirty-five subjects presented with gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). Two-thirds of those 35 subjects were in the mefenamic acid group. There were no differences between the safety profiles of the two meloxicam dosages. Laboratory abnormalities did not differ in incidence among the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Both of the daily doses of meloxicam tested were comparable to 500 mg mefenamic acid t.i.d. in relieving dysmenorrhea symptoms, and meloxicam seems to have a better gastrointestinal tolerability profile.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号