首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国系统评价研究的状况调查
引用本文:苏茜,王维利,李惠萍. 中国系统评价研究的状况调查[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2008, 14(10)
作者姓名:苏茜  王维利  李惠萍
摘    要:目的 探讨中国系统评价研究的相关情况.方法 对1996--2006年中国所有期刊杂志中的系统评价进行检索,并分析结果.结果 中国近十年来共刊登相关文献646篇,其中系统评价291篇,系统综述13篇,Meta分析264篇,荟萃分析78篇.刊载的系统评价文献数量逐年递增,由1999年的1篇激增到2006年的208篇,内容涉及到整个医学生物领域的理论、应用、调查等方面.其中应用类的质量评价为1级,即采用最佳证据(随机对照试验)的文献为343篇,占该类文献的60.39%.护理方面的文献共9篇,占所有文献的1.39%.结论 系统评价发展迅速,中国正处于将循证医学中的系统评价引入实践的阶段,并取得了一定成绩,然而发展中尚存在一些难点、盲点,系统评价(尤其是护理领域)的相关研究数量和质量均有待进一步提高.

关 键 词:系统评价  系统综述  Meta分析  调查

The survey on current situation of system evaluation in China
SU Xi,WANG Wei-li,LI Hui-ping. The survey on current situation of system evaluation in China[J]. Modern Nursing, 2008, 14(10)
Authors:SU Xi  WANG Wei-li  LI Hui-ping
Abstract:Objective To explore the current situation of system evaluation in China. MethodsThe system evaluation in all Chinese periodical and magazines were indexed from 1996 to 2006, and theresults were analyzed. Results There are 646 published pieces about system evaluation in the latest tenyears in China. The published systematic review document increased year by year, sharply from 1 piece in1999 to 208 pieces in 2006, while the contents involve every aspect of medicine biology. 343 pieces of thesedocuments using the best evidence, the randomized controlled trial, account for 60.39% of all. There are 9pieces nursing documents, only occupying 1.39%. Conclusions The system evaluation is developingrapidly in China. We are now on the stage of putting the systematic review of the Evidence-based medicineinto practice. Though, we achieve some success, there are still some difficulties and blind spots in itsdevelopment, and the quantity and quality of correlated investigation in system evaluation, especially innursing field, are waiting for further boost.
Keywords:Systematic review  System evaluation  Meta-analysis  Survey
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号