腰丛-坐骨神经联合臀上皮神经阻滞麻醉与腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术的临床效果观察

目的分析腰丛-坐骨神经联合臀上皮神经阻滞麻醉与腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术的临床疗效。方法髋关节置换患者50例,将50例患者随机分为腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉组(A组)和腰丛-坐骨神经联合臀上皮神经阻滞麻醉组(B组)。结果患者在麻醉前心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、血氧饱和度(SpO_2)值比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),A组麻醉后、手术开始10、20、30分钟的HR、SBP、DBP低于麻醉前(P0.05)),A组患者HR与B组比较,有明显变化,B组患者麻醉后、手术开始10、20、30分钟的HR、SBP、DBP、SpO_2与麻醉前比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。B组与A组同时点HR、SBP、DBP比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。B组麻醉优良率高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腰丛-坐骨神经联合臀上皮神经阻滞麻醉对循环、呼吸系统影响小,可用于髋关节置换术。

Combined anesthesia of lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve and superior clunial nerve versus spinal-epi-dural analgesia in total hip replacement:an observation of clinical effects

Objective To compare the clinical effects of combined anesthesia of lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve and superior clunial nerve versus spinal-epidural analgesia in total hip replacement. Methods Fifty cases of total hip replacement were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A received combined anesthesia of lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve and superior clunial nerve,while patients in group B received spinal-epidural analgesia. Results There were no significant differences in preoperative HR, SBP,DBP and SpO2 between the groups(P > 0. 05). Compared with pre-anesthesia data,HR,SBP,DBP in group A were significantly lower during the anesthesia(P < 0. 05). In group B,there were no significant changes in HR,SBP,DBP and SpO2 during the anesthesia( P > 0. 05). Patients′ heart rate in group A showed significant changes compared with that in group B. The differences in HR,SBP and DBP between group A and B at the same time points were significant(P < 0. 05). Superior rate of anesthesia in group B is higher than that in group A(P < 0. 05). Conclusion Combined anesthesia of lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve and superior clunial nerve has limited influence on the circulatory and respiratory systems,which can be used for total hip replacement.