Automatic Implantable Scanning Burst Pacemakers for Recurrent Tachyarrhythmias

Ninety patients (13 patients with supraventricular tachycardia and 72 patients with ventricular tachycardia) underwent electrophysiological study. Six out of 18 patients with supraventricular tachycardia (33%) and one out of 72 patients with ventricular tachycardia (1.4%) were considered suitable candidates for the scanning pacemaker. However, only six of the seven patients underwent implantation. The seventh patient decided not to undergo implantation and continued to have recurrent episodes of supraventricular tachycardia. The scanning pacemaker delivers extrastimuli at preset initial and coupled delay after four cycles of tachycardia. If tachycardia is not terminated, another set of extrastimuli are delivered with a decrement in the coupling cycle. During the follow-up period of 7-25 months (mean, 14.3 months), tachycardia cycle lengths and termination windows changed in four patients. The pacemakers in these patients were reprogrammed multiple times (2 to 6 times with a mean of 3.5) as the previous number of extrastimuli and intervals were ineffective in the termination of tachycardias. The major limitations of the extrastimulus pacemaker were: 1) only a small percentage of patients were suitable candidates for its use; (2) the initially selected termination window in the majority of patients was ineffective during the follow-up period due mainly to the changes in tachycardia cycle length and subsequent termination windows; and (3) the majority (five out of six patients in this series) of patients needed additional pharmacologic therapy to modify their tachycardia rates. However, despite these limitations, the scanning pacemaker may be an additional tool in the management of recurrent tachyarrhythmias in selected patients.