首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Development of a Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool for Selecting Appropriate Rehabilitation Interventions for Injured Workers
Authors:Douglas P Gross  Jing Zhang  Ivan Steenstra  Susan Barnsley  Calvin Haws  Tyler Amell  Greg McIntosh  Juliette Cooper  Osmar Zaiane
Institution:1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada
2. Workers’ Compensation Board-Alberta Millard Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada
3. Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
4. Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
5. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
6. Workers’ Compensation Board-Alberta Health Care Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
7. Centric Health, Calgary, AB, Canada
8. CBI Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
9. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Abstract:Purpose To develop a classification algorithm and accompanying computer-based clinical decision support tool to help categorize injured workers toward optimal rehabilitation interventions based on unique worker characteristics. Methods Population-based historical cohort design. Data were extracted from a Canadian provincial workers’ compensation database on all claimants undergoing work assessment between December 2009 and January 2011. Data were available on: (1) numerous personal, clinical, occupational, and social variables; (2) type of rehabilitation undertaken; and (3) outcomes following rehabilitation (receiving time loss benefits or undergoing repeat programs). Machine learning, concerned with the design of algorithms to discriminate between classes based on empirical data, was the foundation of our approach to build a classification system with multiple independent and dependent variables. Results The population included 8,611 unique claimants. Subjects were predominantly employed (85 %) males (64 %) with diagnoses of sprain/strain (44 %). Baseline clinician classification accuracy was high (ROC = 0.86) for selecting programs that lead to successful return-to-work. Classification performance for machine learning techniques outperformed the clinician baseline classification (ROC = 0.94). The final classifiers were multifactorial and included the variables: injury duration, occupation, job attachment status, work status, modified work availability, pain intensity rating, self-rated occupational disability, and 9 items from the SF-36 Health Survey. Conclusions The use of machine learning classification techniques appears to have resulted in classification performance better than clinician decision-making. The final algorithm has been integrated into a computer-based clinical decision support tool that requires additional validation in a clinical sample.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号