微创单纯抽吸术与皮下组织剥离剪除术治疗腋臭的临床效果对比

目的 通过对腋毛区两种术式治疗腋臭的疗效对比,探索一种更好地治疗腋臭的手术方法.方法 对72例腋臭患者随机分为两组,36例行微切口单纯抽吸术（A组）,另36例经腋皱襞切开行皮下组织剥离剪除术（B组）,对两组的手术时间、疗效、并发症、瘢痕、恢复时间等进行总结对比分析.结果 经6～12个月随访,两组患者腋臭治疗总有效率100％.A组在手术时间、术后并发症、恢复时间、瘢痕、腋毛存活等方面明显优于B组,两组差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 微创单纯抽吸术治疗腋臭疗效可靠,安全便捷,瘢痕更小而隐匿,并发症少,恢复快,更易被患者接受.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between minimally invasive simple liposuction and dissection and excision of subcutaneous tissue on axillary osmidrosis

Objective To explore a more efficient surgical method to cure axillary osmidrosis through a comparative study on results from two surgical treatments of axillary osmidrosis in the armpit area.Methods 72 patients were randomized into two groups,in which 36 patients （group A） with micro-incision simple liposuction and 36 patients （group B） with dissection and excision of subcutaneous tissue from axillary folds.The clinical outcomes in the two groups were comparatively analyzed,based on surgery time,effect,complications,scarring and recovery time.Results The total efficiency of axillary osmidrosis treatment was 100％ after 6-12 months clinical follow-up towards two groups.There was no significantly statistical difference on the effect of both groups.Micro-incision simple liposuction was obviously superior to dissection and excision of subcutaneous tissue from axillary folds based on surgery time,complications,recovery time,scarring and armpit hair survival rate.The two groups were significantly different （P＜0.05）.Conclusions Minimally invasive simple liposuction,as a treatment for axillary osmidrosis is a method with more effectiveness and reliability.It is a more acceptable approach to patients in view of safety and convenience,smaller and invisible scarring,fewer complications,and less recovery time.