首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中西医结合治疗与单纯西医治疗肺癌疗效的Meta分析
引用本文:张生潭,兰新宇,陈莉,孙秀凤,孙景存,肖莉.中西医结合治疗与单纯西医治疗肺癌疗效的Meta分析[J].中医药学刊,2014(10):2524-2527.
作者姓名:张生潭  兰新宇  陈莉  孙秀凤  孙景存  肖莉
作者单位:河北省沧州中西医结合医院,河北沧州061001
摘    要:目的:系统评价中西医结合与单纯西医药治疗肺癌(lung cancer)的疗效和不良反应。方法:计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊网、万方数据库、维普数据库,并配合手工检索所有文献全文,由两位评价者分别对资料进行质量评价,用Revman 5.1进行meta分析,主要对实体瘤近期疗效、生存质量、不良反应进行分析。结果:共纳入16个随机对照试验,目前资料的meta分析结果显示:临床治疗有效率:异质性检验P=0.78,表明研究数据具有同质性,故采用固定效应模式,合并效应量的OR=2.06,95%的可信区间为1.61~2.63,P〈0.00001,差异有统计学意义,提示中西医结合治疗组优于单纯化疗组;患者生存质量改善:OR=3.07,95%的可信区间为2.18~4.33,P〈0.00001,差异有统计学意义,提示中西医结合治疗组优于单纯化疗组;不良反应发生:1白细胞减少/骨髓抑制OR=0.29,95%的可信区间为0.21~0.40,P〈0.00001,差异有统计学意义,提示中西医结合治疗组优于单纯化疗组;2胃肠道反应(恶心、呕吐)OR=0.25,95%的可信区间为0.15~0.42,P〈0.00001,差异有统计学意义,提示中西医结合治疗组优于单纯化疗组。结论:中西医结合治疗肺癌的疗效优于单纯西药。

关 键 词:中西医结合疗法  肺癌  meta分析  随机对照试验

Meta-analysis of Integration of Traditional and Western Medicine Treatment Versus Western Treatment in Patients with Lung Cancer
ZHANG Shengtan,LAN Xinyu,CHEN Li,SUN Xiufeng,SUN Jingcun,XIAO Li.Meta-analysis of Integration of Traditional and Western Medicine Treatment Versus Western Treatment in Patients with Lung Cancer[J].Study Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2014(10):2524-2527.
Authors:ZHANG Shengtan  LAN Xinyu  CHEN Li  SUN Xiufeng  SUN Jingcun  XIAO Li
Institution:( Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Cangzhou 061001, Heibei, China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare the effect of integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine with western medicine therapy for lung cancer. Methods: Relevantliteratures were reviewed via database and assessed via randomized controlled trial(RCT) scale. All reviewed literatures were assessed via Jadad quality scale. Data statistical analysis was performed by RevMan5. 1 software. Results: Clinical efficient:since test for heterogeneity: P = 0. 78,it indicated the data had homogeneity,so we used the fixed effect model. OR = 2. 06,95% CI 1. 61 ~ 263,P〈0. 01(P〈0. 00001). It meant that integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment for lung cancer in improving clinical symptom had obvious advantages compared with Western medicine. For evaluation of quality of life,OR = 3. 07,95% CI 2. 18 ~ 4. 33,P〈0. 01(P〈0. 00001). It meant that integration of traditional Chinese and Western Medicine treatment for colorectal cancer in improving quality of life had obvious advantages compared with Western medicine. For the main toxicity: 1occurrence of hematological toxicity:OR = 0. 29,95% CI 0. 21 ~ 0. 40,P〈0. 01(P〈0. 00001);2occurrence of neurotoxicity:OR = 0. 25,95% CI 0. 15 ~ 0. 42,P〈0. 01(P〈0. 00001). They meant that integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment for colorectal cancer in reducing toxicity had obvious advantages compared with Western medicine. Conclusion:Integration treatment for lung cancer shows good curative effect,and there are obvious advantages compared with Western medicine.
Keywords:traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment  lung cancer:Meta-analysis  randomized compara-tive trial
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号