首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessment of myocardial viability: comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the current era
Authors:Tomlinson David R  Becher Harald  Selvanayagam Joseph B
Affiliation:

aDepartment of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

bDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

cDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia

Abstract:Detecting viable myocardium, whether hibernating or stunned, is of clinical significance in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Echocardiographic assessments of myocardial thickening and endocardial excursion during dobutamine infusion provide a highly specific marker for myocardial viability, but with relatively less sensitivity. The additional modalities of myocardial contrast echocardiography and tissue Doppler have recently been proposed to provide further, quantitative measures of myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become popular for the assessment of myocardial viability as it can assess cardiac function, volumes, myocardial scar, and perfusion with high-spatial resolution. Both 'delayed enhancement' CMR and dobutamine stress CMR have important roles in the assessment of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This article reviews the recent advances in both echocardiography and CMR for the clinical assessment of myocardial viability. It attempts to provide a pragmatic approach toward the patient-specific assessment of this important clinical problem.
Keywords:Myocardial viability   Dobutamine stress echocardiography   Tissue Doppler echocardiography   Myocardial contrast echocardiography   Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号