Determinants of participation in prostate cancer screening: A simple analytical framework to account for healthy‐user bias |
| |
Authors: | Takahiro Tabuchi Tomio Nakayama Wakaba Fukushima Ichiro Matsunaga Satoko Ohfuji Kyoko Kondo Eiji Kawano Hiroyuki Fukuhara Yuri Ito Akira Oshima |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Center for Cancer Control and Statistics, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan;2. Urban Research Plaza, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan;3. Department of Public Health, Osaka City University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan;4. Department of Sociology, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan;5. Department of Economics, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | In Japan at present, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is recommended for cancer screening while routine population‐based prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening is not. In future it may be necessary to increase participation in the former and decrease it in the latter. Our objectives were to explore determinants of PSA‐screening participation while simultaneously taking into account factors associated with FOBT. Data were gathered from a cross‐sectional study conducted with random sampling of 6191 adults in Osaka city in 2011. Of 3244 subjects (return rate 52.4%), 936 men aged 40–64 years were analyzed using log‐binomial regression to explore factors related to PSA‐screening participation within 1 year. Only responders for cancer screening, defined as men who participated in either FOBT or PSA‐testing, were used as main study subjects. Men who were older (prevalence ratio [PR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 2.17 [1.43, 3.28] for 60–64 years compared with 40–49 years), had technical or junior college education (PR [95% CI] = 1.76 [1.19, 2.59] compared with men with high school or less) and followed doctors' recommendations (PR [95% CI] = 1.50 [1.00, 2.26]) were significantly more likely to have PSA‐screening after multiple variable adjustment among cancer‐screening responders. Attenuation in PR of hypothesized common factors was observed among cancer‐screening responders compared with the usual approach (among total subjects). Using the analytical framework to account for healthy‐user bias, we found three factors related to participation in PSA‐screening with attenuated association of common factors. This approach may provide a more sophisticated interpretation of participation in various screenings with different levels of recommendation. |
| |
Keywords: | Determinants of participation healthy‐user bias Japan prostate cancer screening prostate‐specific antigen test |
|
|