首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

卒中后失语患者抑郁问卷(医院版)的验证:与HAMD-17和BDI-13的比较
引用本文:王维清,许璇,刘晓加,陈东,王心宇.卒中后失语患者抑郁问卷(医院版)的验证:与HAMD-17和BDI-13的比较[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2011,19(5):376-380.
作者姓名:王维清  许璇  刘晓加  陈东  王心宇
作者单位:1. 510515,广州,南方医科大学南方医院神经内科311600;建德市第一人民医院神经内科
2. 南方医科大学南方医院神经内科,广州,510515
摘    要:目的 初步探讨医院版卒中后失语患者抑郁问卷(Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire-Hospital version,SADQ-H)诊断卒中后抑郁的截断值.方法 运用接受者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线法,以17项汉密尔...

关 键 词:精神病状态评定量表  抑郁  卒中  失语

Validation of Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire Hospital Version: comparison with HAMD-17 and BDI-13
WANG Wei-qing,XU Xuan,LIU Xiao-jia,CHEN Dong,WANG Xin-yu.Validation of Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire Hospital Version: comparison with HAMD-17 and BDI-13[J].International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases,2011,19(5):376-380.
Authors:WANG Wei-qing  XU Xuan  LIU Xiao-jia  CHEN Dong  WANG Xin-yu
Abstract:Objective To preliminarily investigate the cutoff value of Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire Hospital Version (SADQ-H) in the diagnosis of post-stroke depression. Methods Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the total scores of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) greater than 7 points and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13) greater than 4 points were taken as the cutoff values for the assessment of depression. SADQ-H for the assessment of the depression classification standard in patients with post-stroke aphasia was investigated preliminarily by HAMD-17 (8-17 were mild depression; 18-24 were moderate depression, and>24 was severe depression). Results When HAMD-17 was used as a standard, ROC area under curve (AUC) was 0. 909 (95% confidence interval CI] 0.814-1.005). When 19.50 was used as a cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and κ coefficient of SADQ-H were 82. 6%,91.7%, 87. 0%, 83.3%, and 0. 77, respectively. When BDI-13 was used as a standard, ROC AUC was 0. 916 (95% CI 0. 824-1. 008). When choosing 18.50 as a cutoff value of diagnosis,the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and κ coefficient of SADQ-H were 80. 0%, 90. 0%, 84. 0%, 90. 0%, and 0. 68, respectively. The classification standards of SADQ-H for the assessment of depression in patients with post-stroke aphasia were 19, 22 and 26 points. Conclusions When the cutoff value of SADQ-H was 19 points, it had higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the assessment of depression; 19, 22 and 26 points could be used as the classification diagnostic standard of SADQ-H in the assessment of depression in patients with post-stroke aphasia.
Keywords:Psychiatric status rating scales  Depression  Stroke  Aphasia
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号