首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

2012年度某院患者无菌体液耐药性监测的调查
引用本文:何秀丽,曹何,张晓恒,严立,张晓兵,阳苹,黄世峰,牛司强,孙珊,李兴钊,张莉萍. 2012年度某院患者无菌体液耐药性监测的调查[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2013, 34(21): 2858-2860,2862
作者姓名:何秀丽  曹何  张晓恒  严立  张晓兵  阳苹  黄世峰  牛司强  孙珊  李兴钊  张莉萍
作者单位:重庆医科大学附属第一医院检验科,重庆400016
基金项目:国家临床重点专科建设项目经费资助.
摘    要:目的 了解2012年度该院患者无菌体液的细菌分布和对抗菌药物的耐药性.方法 对临床送检的无菌体液标本按常规进行病原菌分离,采用Vitek2-Compact系统和ATB Express系统进行鉴定,测定抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值,采用纸片扩散法(K-B)进行微生物敏感性试验.应用WHONET 5.6软件进行数据分析.结果 分离菌株556株,革兰阴性菌316株(57%),革兰阳性菌226株(40%).常见细菌分别为大肠埃希菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、粪肠球菌、屎肠球菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌.大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌的检出率分别为53.3%和21.1%;检出9株金黄色葡萄球菌,其中,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(66%);耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(74%).未发现对万古霉素和利奈唑胺耐药的葡萄球菌.未发现对万古霉素耐药的肠球菌属细菌.大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌对碳青酶烯类耐药的检出率分别为3.8%和3.8%.结论 及时监测病原菌的菌群种类、分布和耐药变迁以指导临床合理、规范地使用抗菌药物.

关 键 词:微生物敏感性试验  体液  抗菌药物  抗药性,微生物

Annual surveillance of drug resistance of sterile body fluids of patients in a certain hospital in 2012
He Xiuli,Cao He,Zhang Xiaoheng,Yah Li,Zhang Xiaobing,Yang Ping,Huang Shi f eng,Niu Siqiang,Sun Shan,Li X ingzhao,Zhang Li ping. Annual surveillance of drug resistance of sterile body fluids of patients in a certain hospital in 2012[J]. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2013, 34(21): 2858-2860,2862
Authors:He Xiuli  Cao He  Zhang Xiaoheng  Yah Li  Zhang Xiaobing  Yang Ping  Huang Shi f eng  Niu Siqiang  Sun Shan  Li X ingzhao  Zhang Li ping
Affiliation:(Department of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China)
Abstract:Objective To learn the bacterial distribution of sterile body fluids of patients and the antimicrobial resistance in a certain hospital in 2012. Methods Pathogens were isolated conventionally from clinical sterile body fluids specimens and were iden tilled by Vitek2-Compact system and the ATB Express systems. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) method and Kirby- Bauer(K B) method were employed to conduct the microbial sensitivity test. Data analysis was performed with WHONET 5. 6 software . Results Results 556 bacterial strains were isolated with 316(57%) of gram-negative and 226(40%) of gram-positive. The most common bacteria were Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Klebsiella pneurnoniae, Enterococcus f aeca lis , Enterococcus feces, Acinetobacter baumannii , Pseudornonas aeruginosa , respectively. The detection rates of Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae were 53.3 % and 21.1 %, respectively. Nine strains of Staphylococcus aureus were detected, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (66 %) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci( 74 % ). No vancomycin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus and linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were detected. And no vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteria were found, either. The detection rates of carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were 3.8 % and 3.8 %, respectively. Conclusion Pathogenic flora species, distribution and changes in antibiotics resistantance should be monitored timely to guide clinical use of antimicrobial drugs rationally and standardly.
Keywords:microbial sensitivity tests  body fluids  anti-bacterial agents  drug resistance, microbial
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号