Defining Urban and Rural Areas in U.S. Epidemiologic Studies |
| |
Authors: | Susan A. Hall PhD Jay S. Kaufman Thomas C. Ricketts |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Among epidemiologists, there has been increasing interest in the characteristics of communities that influence health. In the United States, the rural health disparity has been a recent focus of attention and made a priority for improvement. While many standardized definitions of urban and rural exist and are used by social scientists and demographers, they are found in sources unfamiliar to health researchers and have largely not been used in public health studies. This paper briefly reviews some available definitions of urban and rural for American geographic subunits and their respective strengths and weaknesses. For example, some definitions are better suited than others for capturing access to health care services. The authors applied different definitions to breast cancer incidence rates to show how urban/rural rate ratio comparisons would vary by choice of definition and found that dichotomous definitions may fail to capture variability in very rural areas. Further study of the utility of these measures in health studies is warranted. Hall and Kaufman are with the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Ricketts is with the North Carolina Rural Health Research and Policy Analysis Center, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Hall is currently with Worldwide Epidemiology, GlaxoSmithKline, P.O. Box 13398, Five Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, USA. |
| |
Keywords: | Epidemiologic measurements Epidemiologic methods Urban health Urban population Review Rural health Rural population |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|