| 窝沟釉质成形封闭术2年临床观察 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张光东,于金华,俞未一,孙卫斌,朱玲,梅予锋,张耀国,陆炜炜.窝沟釉质成形封闭术2年临床观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2002,18(2):108-109. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张光东 于金华 俞未一 孙卫斌 朱玲 梅予锋 张耀国 陆炜炜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 210029,江苏,南京,南京医科大学口腔医学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：评价窝沟釉质成形封闭术的临床效果。方法：在84名儿童的第一磨牙上采用半口对照法比较窝沟釉质成形术和普通封闭术封闭剂的保存率。结果：封闭后6个月和1年时，两者保存率无显著性差异；而在2年时有显著性差异。结论：窝沟釉质成形术好于 普通封闭术。
|
| 关 键 词： | 儿童 窝沟釉质成形封闭术 封闭剂保存率 临床疗效 牙位 性别 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-1634(2002)02-0108-02 |
A 2-year clinic effect of enameloplasty sealant technique |
| |
| ZHANG Guang dong,YU Jin hua,YU Wei yi,et al..A 2-year clinic effect of enameloplasty sealant technique[J].Journal of Clinical Stomatology,2002,18(2):108-109. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Guang dong YU Jin hua YU Wei yi |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Guang dong,YU Jin hua,YU Wei yi,et al. Nanjing Medical University,school of stomatology.Nanjing,210029,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate the clinic effect of EST. Methods EST and CST were applied contralateral first permanent molars of 84 children respectively to compare sealant retention rate of enameloplasty sealant technique with conventional sealant technique. Results There was no significant difference between the retention rate of them after 6 mouths and 1 year; however, significant difference was after 2 years. Conclusion Enameloplasty sealant technique is superior to conventional sealant technique. |
| |
| Keywords: | enameloplasty sealant technique conventional sealant technique sealant retention rate |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
