| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia;2. Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia South West Sydney Clinical School and Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia;3. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland;4. Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Peri-operative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada;5. Department of Anesthesiology, Toronto Western Hospital-University Health Network, ON, Canada;6. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, ON, Canada |
| Abstract: | The learning curve for novices developing regional anaesthesia skills, such as real-time ultrasound-guided needle manipulation, may be affected by innate visuospatial ability, as this influences spatial cognition and motor co-ordination. We conducted a multinational randomised controlled trial to test if novices with low visuospatial ability would perform better at an ultrasound-guided needling task with deliberate practice training than with discovery learning. Visuospatial ability was evaluated using the mental rotations test-A. We recruited 140 medical students and randomly allocated them into low-ability control (discovery learning), low-ability intervention (received deliberate practice), high-ability control, and high-ability intervention groups. Primary outcome was the time taken to complete the needling task, and there was no significant difference between groups: median (IQR [range]) low-ability control 125 s (69–237 [43–600 s]); low-ability intervention 163 s (116–276 [44–600 s]); high-ability control 130 s (80–210 [41–384 s]); and high-ability intervention 177 s (113–285 [43–547 s]), p = 0.06. No difference was found using the global rating scale: mean (95%CI) low-ability control 53% (95%CI 46–60%); low-ability intervention 61% (95%CI 53–68%); high-ability control 63% (95%CI 56–70%); and high-ability intervention 66% (95%CI 60–72%), p = 0.05. For overall procedure pass/fail, the low-ability control group pass rate of 42% (14/33) was significantly less than the other three groups: low-ability intervention 69% (25/36); high-ability control 68% (25/37); and high-ability intervention 85% (29/34) p = 0.003. Further research is required to determine the role of visuospatial ability screening in training for ultrasound-guided needle skills. |
