Iodixanol in intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography: a comparison with iohexol |
| |
Authors: | B. E. Kendall A. Sheppick J. Ø. Nossen J. M. Stevens |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Radiology, Maida Vale Hospital, London, UK;(2) Nycomed Ltd, Birmingham, UK;(3) Nycomed AS, Oslo, Norway;(4) National Hospital, Queen Square, WCIN 3BG London, UK |
| |
Abstract: | We randomised 86 patients undergoing intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) to receive iodixanol (Visipaque; Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) 150 mgI/ml or iohexol (Omnipaque; Nycomed) 140 mgI/ml. The efficacy and safety of these two contrast media were compared: efficacy by evaluating the diagnostic information and radiographic density yielded by the angiograms, safety by recording all discomfort connected with the injections, and all adverse events up to 24 h after the investigation. Diagnostic information was optimal in all patients and the overall radiographic density optimal in all but one (iohexol) (P=0.49). A feeling of warmth, the only discomfort reported, was experienced by 43% and 54% of patients receiving iodixanol and iohexol, respectively (P=0.26). Two patients in the iodixanol group and five in the iohexol group reported one adverse event (nausea, dizziness, visual disturbance or paraesthesiae) (P=0.30); all were of mild severity except for one moderate adverse event in each group. Iodixanol 150 mgI/ml and iohexol 140 mgI/ml were demonstrated to be suitable for IADSA, with no clinically or statistically significant differences in efficacy, discomfort or adverse events. |
| |
Keywords: | Iodixanol Iohexol Contrast medium Intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|