Cervical magnetic stimulation

We stimulated the cervical region with a 9-cm-diameter magnetic coil on centered on the spinous processes in 21 normal subjects. We obtained maximal amplitudes with clockwise coil current in right-sided upper extremity muscles and counterclockwise coil current in left-sided upper extremity muscles. Optimal stimulation sites for biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi were C-3 or C-4, C-4 or C-5, and C-4, C-5, or C-6, respectively. The latencies of the muscle responses varied little in the same subject in spite of marked amplitude changes due to suboptimal position of the coil or submaximal stimulator output. In abductor digiti minimi, the amplitude of the muscle response on cervical magnetic stimulation was 9 to 100% of the supramaximal amplitude on wrist electrical stimulation. We established normal values for latency, amplitude, and interside differences for the above 3 upper extremity muscles. The findings were reproducible, and the latencies obtained with large coils from different manufacturers in the same subjects were comparable. We found no advantage in bipolar recording over tendon-belly montage. Comparison of magnetic and electrical needle root stimulation in the same subjects showed that the magnetic stimulus was more proximal in biceps and triceps, and that the site of excitation was approximately the same in abductor digiti minimi. Indirect assessment of the longitudinal site of excitation based on F-wave minimal latency indicated that excitation occurred within millimeters of the emergence of axon of the peripheral motor neuron.