Comparison of concomitant boost radiotherapy against concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers: A phase III randomised trial |
| |
Authors: | Anupam Rishi Sushmita Ghoshal Roshan Verma Arun S. Oinam Vijai M. Patil Rakesh Mohinder Suresh C. Sharma |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;2. Department of Head and Neck Cancer Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;3. Department of Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;4. Department of Biostatistics, Punjab University, Chandigarh, India |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeTo test the toxicity and efficacy of concomitant boost radiotherapy alone against concurrent chemoradiation (conventional fractionation) in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer in our patient population.Methods and materialsIn this open-label, randomised trial, 216 patients with histologically proven Stage III–IVA oropharyngeal cancer were randomly assigned between June 2006 and December 2010 to receive either chemoradiation (CRT) to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22 and 43) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost (CBRT) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions over 5 weeks. The compliance, toxicity and quality of life were investigated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log rank test.ResultsThe compliance to radiotherapy was superior in concomitant boost with lesser treatment interruptions (p = 0.004). Expected acute toxicities were significantly higher in CRT, except for grade 3/4 mucositis which was seen more in CBRT arm (39% and 55% in CRT and CBRT, respectively; p = 0.02). Late toxicities like Grade 3 xerostomia were significantly high in CRT arm than CBRT arm (33% versus 18%; p < 0.0001). The quality of life was significantly poor in CRT arm at all follow up visits (p < 0.0001). The rates of 2 year disease-free survival were similar with 56% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 61% in CBRT group (p = 0.2; HR-0.81, 95%CI-0.53–1.2). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with nodal size >2 cm had significantly better DFS with CRT (p = 0.05; HR-1.59, 95%CI-0.93–2.7).ConclusionIn selected patients of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer, concomitant boost offers a better compliance, toxicity profile and quality of life with similar disease control, than chemoradiation. |
| |
Keywords: | Chemoradiation Concomitant boost Oropharynx Toxicity Efficacy |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|