首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

外固定支架及钢板内固定治疗股骨干骨折临床分析
引用本文:仇继任.外固定支架及钢板内固定治疗股骨干骨折临床分析[J].中国现代医生,2013,51(7):149-150.
作者姓名:仇继任
作者单位:仇继任 (广西壮族自治区钦州市第二人民医院骨科,广西钦州,535000);
摘    要:目的比较两种不同手术方式治疗股骨干骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2009年1月~2012年1月期问收治的采用外固定支架及钢板内固定治疗股骨十骨折患者的临床资料,对两组手术方式骨折愈合时间、并发症、负重时间、优良率进行比较,并作统计学分析。结果两组临床疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).两组愈合时间、负重时间的比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),两组并发症发生率的比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论外固定支架及钢板内固定治疗股骨干骨折近期疗效相当,临床应根据患者实际情况,选择合适的手术方式,遵循手术个体化原则,使患者得到满意的疗效。

关 键 词:外固定支架  钢板内固定  股骨干骨折

Analysis of external fixation and internal fixation with steel plate in treat- ing femoral shaft fracture
Authors:QIU Jiren
Institution:QIU Jiren Department of Orthopedics,the Second People's Hospital of Qinzhou City in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Qinzhou 535000, China
Abstract:Objective To compare two different surgical treatment of fracture of femoral shaft. Methods Retrospective from January 2009 to January 2012 years admitted to using external fixation and plate fixation in treatment of femoral shaft fractures in patients with clinical information,through two sets of surgical fracture healing time, complications, good loading time, compare rates, and statistical analysis. Results Two sets of clinical effects of the difference was not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05), two group comparison of healing time, load time difference was not statistically sig- nificant (P 〉 0.05), two group comparison of the incidence of complications the difference was not statistically signifi- cant (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion External fixation and internal fixation with steel plate in treating femoral shaft fracture ef- fect, should be paid in accordance with the actual situation, select the appropriate mode of operation, follow the prin- ciple of operation of individual,so that patients are satisfied with the results.
Keywords:External fixation  Internal fixation with steel plate  Femoral shaft fracture
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号