Evaluation of safety,efficacy and clinical outcome after endovascular treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in coil-first setting. A 10-year series from a single center

Introduction

The endovascular treatment (EVT) of ruptured cerebral aneurysms has been widely adopted after the publication of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. In this study, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the EVT for ruptured aneurysms based on 10-year series from a single center with coil-first strategy.

Methods

All patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) treated between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and divided according to initial treatment into an EVT and a microsurgical clipping (MSC) group. Clinical and radiological findings at presentation, treatment modalities and procedural complications were recorded. The angiographic and clinical outcome was compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 587 patients with aSAH were reviewed (452 EVT, 135 MSC). There were no significant differences in mean age or the Hunt and Hess grades. Parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) was more frequent in the MSC. Procedure related complications of the acute treatment were recorded in 5.5% and 32% in the EVT and MSC, respectively. The rate of retreatment was 21.9% in the EVT and 5.9% in the MSC. Late rehemorrhage was not observed in either group. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome between the two treatment groups after adjustment for other prognostic factors.

Conclusion

The majority of ruptured intracranial aneurysms can be managed via an endovascular approach in the acute phase with excellent safety profile and good efficacy. Despite the high rate of reperfusion after primary endovascular approach, retreatment has a very low rate of complications and the rate of recurrent hemorrhage is very low.