首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

路边摊对唐山市民生活和城市管理的影响
引用本文:闫亚飞,李凌,周梦迪,靳净.路边摊对唐山市民生活和城市管理的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2014,0(8):1243-1245.
作者姓名:闫亚飞  李凌  周梦迪  靳净
作者单位:闫亚飞(中国.河北联合大学心理学院 唐山 063000);李凌(中国.河北联合大学心理学院 唐山 063000);周梦迪(中国.河北联合大学心理学院 唐山 063000);靳净(中国.河北联合大学心理学院 唐山 063000);
基金项目:2013年河北省大学生创新性实验计划(项目编号:编号201310081035)
摘    要:目的探讨路边摊对唐山市民生活和城市管理的影响。方法采用自制路边摊对城市管理的影响问卷和自测健康评定量表对183名唐山市居民进行测查。结果①光顾路边摊频率不同的人在身体症状与器官功能因子和生理健康总分上差异具有统计学意义(F=13.670,5.722;P0.01),光顾路边摊每周小于3次的高于每周3次的,每周3次的高于每周大于3次的;②光顾路边摊频率不同的人在正向情绪因子和心理健康总分上差异具有统计学意义(F=92.427,16.981;P0.01),光顾路边摊每周大于3次的高于每周3次的,每周3次的高于每周小于3次的;在心理症状与负向情绪因子上差异具有统计学意义(F=5.242,P0.01),光顾路边摊每周大于3次的高于每周3次的和每周小于3次的;③不同频率光顾路边摊的人在角色活动与社会适应上差异具有统计学意义(F=16.445,P0.01),光顾路边摊每周大于3次的高于每周3次,每周3次的高于每周小于3次的;④调查中支持取缔路边摊的占12.50%,支持路边摊无条件解禁的占23.68%,支持路边摊应有条件解禁的高达46.05%。结论光顾路边摊对市民生活影响利弊共存,只要将路边摊合理规范化,路边摊是有存在的必要性的。

关 键 词:路边摊  唐山市民  生活影响  城市管理  社会心理学

The Effect of Roadside Booth on City Management and Citizen Life in Tangshan
Institution:Yan Yafei , Li Ling, Zhou Mengdi , et al.( Department of Psychology, Hebei United University, Tangshan 063000, P. R. China)
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of roadside booth on city management and citizen life in Tangshan .Methods Asking 183 Tangshan residents to complete the SRHMS and a self -designed questionnaire for assessing the influence of roadside booth on city management .Results ①There were stgnoficant dofferences between participants with different frequency of patvoniving road booth in physical symptom and organic function and physical health factors (F=13.670,5.722;P〈0.01).In those factors,participants who pat-ronized road booth less than three times per week had higher scores than those who patronized road booth three times per week ,and par-ticipants who patronized road booth more than three times per week had the lowest scores .②The participants who patronized road booth in different frequency and significantly different positive emotion and mental health were (F=92.427,16.981;P〈0.01).In those fac-tors,participants who patronized road booth more than three times per week had higher scores than those who patronized road booth three times per week ,and participants who patronized road booth less than three times per week had the lowest scores .The participants who patronized road booth in different frequency had significant different physical symptom and negative emotion were ( F =5.242, P 〈0.01).In those factors,participants who patronized road booth more than three times per week had higher scores than those who patron -ized road booth three times and less than three times per week .③The participants who patronized road booth in different frequency were significant different role activity and social adaptability factor (F=16.445,P〈0.01).In the factor,participants who patronized road booth more than three times per week had higher scores than those who patronized road booth three times per week ,and participants who patronized road booth less than three times per week had the lowest scores .④Participants who supported the ban on roadside booth ac-counted for 12.50%,participants who supported unconditionally lifting the ban on roadside booth accounted for 23.68%,and 46.05%supported conditionally lifting the ban .Conclusion Roadside booth is a double -bladed sward for citizen life ,and its necessity bases on reasonable normalization .
Keywords:The roadside booth  The citizens of Tangshan  The influence of life  City management  Social psychology
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号