首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

两种获取牙龈卟啉单胞菌基因组DNA方法比较
引用本文:陈晓涛,钟良军,杨柯,钱雅静,李泽慧.两种获取牙龈卟啉单胞菌基因组DNA方法比较[J].新疆医科大学学报,2007,30(3):257-259.
作者姓名:陈晓涛  钟良军  杨柯  钱雅静  李泽慧
作者单位:1. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院口腔科,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830001
2. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院口腔科,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830054
摘    要:目的:筛选方便、快捷、有效地获取细菌基因组DNA的方法。方法:采用UNIQ-10柱式细菌基因组DNA抽提试剂盒法和Chelex-100法获取患者龈下菌斑DNA,比较作为PCR扩增模板检测牙龈卟啉单胞菌感染位点的检出率差异,并对2种方法进行比较。结果:试剂盒法与Chelex-100法对牙龈卟啉单胞菌的感染位点检出率差异无统计学意义,但Chelex-100法提取DNA更简单、快速。结论:Chelex-100法抽提细菌基因组DNA适用于对大样本牙周炎患者作细菌学检测分析。

关 键 词:牙龈卟啉单胞菌  试剂盒法  Chelex-100法
文章编号:1009-5551(2007)03-0257-03
收稿时间:2006-03-13
修稿时间:2006年3月7日

The comparison of two ways for extraction of DNA from dental plaque
CHEN Xiao-tao, ZHONG Liang-jun, YANG Ke, et al.The comparison of two ways for extraction of DNA from dental plaque[J].Journal of Xinjiang Medical University,2007,30(3):257-259.
Authors:CHEN Xiao-tao  ZHONG Liang-jun  YANG Ke  
Abstract:Objective: The study was performed to try an alternative method as DNA source for PCR detection. Methods: DNA of subgingival plaque was extracted by two differedt kinds of methods,which were UNIQ-10 Bateria Kit and Chelex-100 assay . The obtained DNA were used as template to detect Porphyromonas gingivalis. Result: There was no statistically significance between two methods. Conclusion: Chelex-100 assay was simple and conventional in extraction of bacteria DNA.
Keywords:DNA
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号